In a way, and ironically, this piece makes a great argument for Sanders' advocacy of breaking the banks. As Frankel underlines, a major reason serious reform - such as raising bank capital significantly - has not taken place and many others have been gutted is the political power of the banks. Frankel lauds Clinton because her proposals are less ambitious and more in line with the political constraints. But wouldn't it be better to cut down the financial industry to size so it does not rule politics in the first place?
This is nothing new and will not stop, the idea multinational banks are anything other than too big to fail is a fantasy. Look at what is going on in the eurozone, do you think Germany can cope with Deutsche Banks 75 trillion USD derivatives liability coming home, 20x German GDP
"Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes it's laws" — Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild 19th century. How far back do you want to go
Debt is control both politically by government of voters, and by banks of government and the public. As debt grows then control grows
'Debt is such a powerful tool, it is such a useful tool, it's much better than colonialism ever was because you can keep control without having an army, without having a whole administration.' Susan George
This whole article is a fantasy. America wanted all this debt and sought it. Now the fallout is being handed onto future generations and as they gain a voice they are unhappy.
'Blessed are the young for they shall inherit the national debt' Pres Hoover - except nobody asked them and many do not have a job
The US may have a trade deficit with the rest of the world, but its multinational companies have a major surplus when it comes to sales in foreign markets – especially China. If the US-China trade war continues to escalate, these firms will be, as US President Donald Trump might put it, the biggest losers.
Policy blunders of epic proportions have become the rule, not the exception, for the US administration. The toxic combination of ill-timed fiscal stimulus, aggressive imposition of tariffs, and unprecedented attacks on the Federal Reserve demands a far more critical assessment of Trumponomics.