Junior Kannah/AFP/Getty Images

Desarrollo sustentable: fácil, obvio y sin necesidad de lumbreras

BUDAPEST –  Las Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) de la Agenda 2030 de las Naciones Unidas incluyen  educación en la escuela primaria para todos los niños, puestos de trabajo para todos los adultos, y el fin del hambre y la pobreza. Estos son aspiraciones nobles – pero muy caras. ¿Podemos realmente pagar los costos de todas?

La OCDE estimó que el cumplimiento de los 17 ODS, que comprenden 169 objetivos de desarrollo específicos, costaría entre $3.3 a 4.5 millones de millones de dólares anualmente – casi la misma suma que el presupuesto federal de Estados Unidos para el año 2016, y mucho más que los casi $132 mil millones que se gastaron el año pasado en todo el mundo en ayuda al desarrollo en el extranjero.

De hecho, sólo la enseñanza primaria universal requeriría de por lo menos $17 mil millones de dólares adicionales en gastos por año, y un comité intergubernamental de la Asamblea General de la ONU estima que erradicar la pobreza representaría una inversión anual en infraestructura de $5 a 7 millones de millones de dólares a nivel mundial. En verdad, las estimaciones varían debido a que nadie sabe con certeza cuánto costará lograr los ODS.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in

  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now