Stanley Lubman

Log in/Register

Email required

Password required Remember me?

Facebook

Twitter

Writing for PS since 2000
1 commentaries
0 videos & podcasts

Senior Fellow and Lecturer, Stanford Law School; Author of Bird in a Cage: Legal Reform in China After Mao.

Sort by: Latest Popular Show: All On Point

China’s and the WTO: Unfinished Business

Dec 19, 2000 Stanley Lubman

0 Add to Bookmarks

 Michele Tantussi/Getty Images

Germany’s Populist Temptation

Apr 19, 2018 Sławomir Sierakowski laments the Christian Social Union's turn to the right since the federal elections last year.

4 Add to Bookmarks
Mikhail Metzel\TASS via Getty Images

The West’s Crisis of Confidence

Apr 19, 2018 Carl Bildt worries that the two countries most responsible for creating the postwar global order are now abandoning it.

6 Add to Bookmarks
Kevin Frayer/Getty Images

No Blank Check for Development Banks

Apr 19, 2018 Kevin P. Gallagher & Jörg Haas want to compel the World Bank and its partner institutions to commit to climate-friendly infrastructure.

0 Add to Bookmarks
Matthew Daniels/U.S. Navy via Getty Images

Missile Strikes Are Not a Syria Strategy

Apr 19, 2018 Richard N. Haass thinks the latest US, British, and French attack failed to achieve even the tactical goal of deterrence.

3 Add to Bookmarks
YE AUNG THU/AFP/Getty Images

The “Next Eleven” and the World Economy

Apr 18, 2018 Jim O'Neill assesses the economic potential of the bloc of countries coming in the wake of the BRICs.

4 Add to Bookmarks
Should We Really Care About Inequality?

Apr 18, 2018 Jason Furman questions whether policymakers should be concerned with balancing economic growth and inequality.

1 Add to Bookmarks
Drew Angerer/Getty Images

A Trade Tutorial for Trump

Apr 18, 2018 Asad Jamal shows what today's US protectionists are getting wrong – and why their ignorance is so dangerous.

8 Add to Bookmarks
Richard Lautens/Toronto Star via Getty Images

Automation and American Leadership

Apr 18, 2018 Robert Skidelsky suggests that economic equity and global technological dominance might be incompatible political goals.

5 Add to Bookmarks