Thanks a lot for all these comments. My point in writing this article was not to discuss how best to regulate taxi services and how Uber should be accommodated, if at all. All I wanted to say is that very often in Europe, as opposed to the US, regulatory restrictions protect incumbents without even an indirect reference to the general interest objectives these restrictions are meant to achieve. As a result, any entry that is perceived to eliminate some rents is prohibited, completely stopping innovation in many sectors of the economy. Innovative entrepreneurs exist in Europe as well. Let them start an activity when entry does not immediately affect any general interest. Adapt regulation to new technologies instead of blocking any technological development.
With the passing of Prince Philip on April 9, the United Kingdom may have lost its last exponent of the stoic attitude that has defined so much of its modern history. Nonetheless, other cultures have picked up the baton, and modern society will always have a need for those who excel at keeping calm and carrying on.
wonder if Prince Philip's signature stoicism still has a place in contemporary society.
Even in a crisis as grave as the COVID-19 pandemic, money is not a panacea, and borrowing makes sense only if it is carried out prudently and reasonably. Otherwise, states will jeopardize their long-term financial flexibility, price stability, and competitiveness.
worries that monetization of pandemic-related government borrowing will boost inflation and erode competitiveness.