jin21_Zhang BinChina News Service via Getty Images_chinacoronavirussuppliesaid

Politics

¿Es este el momento del liderazgo de China?

Apr 3, 2020 Keyu Jin

BEIJING – Cuando dio la bienvenida al Presidente estadounidense Donald Trump en la Ciudad Prohibida de Beijing en 2017, el Presidente chino Xi Jinping apuntó al carácter “paz” en los nombres de los tres salones del gran complejo, con lo que quería subrayar la máxima confuciana “La paz es el mayor bien de todos”.

Hoy más que nunca, el mundo necesita adherir a esa idea, pero sus dos principales potencias están enfrentadas en el peor momento posible. El sentimiento anti chino permea la sociedad estadounidense y un dicho popular en China estos días es “si no sientes ira hacia Estados Unidos, no eres patriota”.

Las tensiones sino-estadounidenses se han vuelto tan intensas que parece que solo un ataque a la Tierra por alienígenas podría relajarlas. Visto así, tal vez debiéramos ver la pandemia del COVID-19 como ese ataque. En vez de seguir culpándose y señalándose recíprocamente, con lo que nada se logra, China y Estados Unidos deberían colaborar para encontrar una vacuna o una cura.

To continue reading, register now.

Subscribe now for unlimited access to everything PS has to offer.

As a registered user, you can enjoy more PS content every month – for free.

Already have an account? Log in

PS Events: What Economics is Missing

Our latest event, What Economics is Missing, is now live.

Click the link below for opening remarks from Dani Rodrik, followed by a discussion among Ashwini Deshpande, Raquel Fernández, Minouche Shafik, and Vera Songwe on how to achieve inclusivity in economics.

Watch Now

new comment has been posted. new comments have been posted.

0 Comments on this paragraph, 26 Comments on this article

Chen Jian Hui Apr 15, 2020

Almost feel sorry for this author. The article was an appeal to China to step away from promoting its own model and/or seek strategic advantage in this crisis. Instead, it stirred an hornet's nest already seething with different underlying resentments. The most common thread, if one can be found, is the existential rejection of China's government and politics. By carrying this pathological loathing of the term "Chinese Communist Party", any reasonable discourse becomes difficult. Instead of focusing on the topics, one falls back on historical grievances, such as the Chinese civil war, Great Leap Forward, Cultural Revolution and other "crimes against humanity". Am surprised no one mentioned Tiananmen. To be sure, some commentators try to wrap their distaste in a veneer of sympathy for the Chinese people. They may even believe the poor common man in China is slavering under the goose step of their communist overlords, and therefore take care to separate their disdain for the CCP and the great Chinese people/great Chinese culture.

To those who are haters of Chinese or China or anything in between (and you are perfectly entitled to do so, this writer lived happily for many years in an environment where my hosts loved France except for the French), the assumption is you at least want to be constructive. You have to decide, do you want China to engage the world or disengage? Yes, China is the world's factory but it did not send its gunboats around the world to force people to buy its goods. Elsewhere on PS, excellent articles have been written by contributors about how the current global economic model is passe because of over-reliance on China in the supply chain, while acknowledging it was the capitalists in US and Europe who created this model. To these friends in the West who think liberal democracy is the end of history, please go out and exercise your vote! Vote to deconstruct the corporate lobbying system, vote to ban super PACs, vote for crippling penalties on corporate outsourcing, vote for science-based government, vote to stick it to the man! Surely you have the power, and every four years to boot! Moreover, each one of you is not only a voter but also an ethical conscientious consumer, one assumes. Only buy stuff made in your own country. If that is not available, go without or go picketing. Or demonstrate or occupy whichever street takes your fancy. You have the power.

But we digress, this was originally about COVID 19. Let us take a look at the known information.

On 30 December 2019, Dr. Li Wenliang circulated to his private Wechat group, comprising his medical school classmates, his concerns about SARs re-emerging, based on a report from Dr. Ai Fen, director of the emergency department at Wuhan Central hospital (see his original screenshots at http://www.bjnews.com.cn/feature/2020/01/31/682076.html).

On 31 December 2019, China reported to WHO China Country Office cases of pneumonia of unknown cause detected in Wuhan City, Hubei Province of China (https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/events-as-they-happen).

On 5 January 2020, WHO publishes DNO based on information from China. It reports on the number of cases in China and also identifies contact tracing as one of the measures being used to address the spread. This is only done under suspicions of human-to-human transmission (https://www.who.int/csr/don/05-january-2020-pneumonia-of-unkown-cause-china/en/).

On 10 January 2020, WHO warns global specialists in technical papers about the risk of human-to-human transmission and urged precautionary measures used in cases of human-to-human transmission, even though initial Chinese studies at that point had found no clear evidence. WHO made the warnings based on the experience of earlier coronavirus outbreaks, such as SARS and MERS (https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/08-04-2020-who-timeline---covid-19)

On 12 January 2020, China made the first novel coronavirus genome sequence available to the world (https://www.who.int/csr/don/12-january-2020-novel-coronavirus-china/en/）which made it possible to create testing kits.

Less than a week ensued between the late Dr. Li's warnings and China telling the world it was doing contact tracing. With hindsight of course, we are all experts. Without clear data at that point whether this was SARS (Dr. Li and Dr. Ai thought it was SARS, they were wrong) or a mutant variant, what else could China have done except report to WHO, which published the warning of an unknown pneumonia on 31 December. Perhaps some commentators were incensed that China "hid" or "lied" about the numbers of deaths. There were talks of urgent urn deliveries and overworked crematoriums being used to "verify" the exponentially higher numbers of deaths. But gentle readers, we are civilized beings, do we need to believe in or see massive death tolls in China to jolt oneself to act? Or wanted the Chinese government to acknowledge pictures of mass graves (later shown to be fake) as part of an elaborate reality show? Are we reduced to Romans baying for blood in the Coliseum to make meaning of things?

If 5 January or even 10 January is a credible first warning to knowledgeable professionals, the question is whether these knowledgeable professionals did anything or whether they should have done anything or they did say something and those in power ignored them. On this topic the jury is still out; history is still being written. The echo chambers of the West are still sounding discordantly between cries of "loyal" and "disloyal" media, much less "fake news". This writer is in no rush to reach any conclusion; our thoughts and prayers are with the stricken and those still living in the shadow of this invisible threat.

One last thing (I do so miss the master Steve), to those who cannot resist a cheap parting shot, that China created the conditions for the virus to evolve because of wet markets, etc, "the science said so" - beware what you ask for. I refer you to this article released by Cambridge University (https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/covid-19-genetic-network-analysis-provides-snapshot-of-pandemic-origins). Using the same genetic typing that proved homo sapiens came out of Africa, these scientists showed that COVID 19 came in three variants, Types A, B and C. Type A was the original human virus and closest to the one found in bats. Types B and C were derivatives. Take a guess as to where Type A was found? Not Wuhan, not China, not East Asia. We quote "Mutated versions of ‘A’ were seen in Americans reported to have lived in Wuhan, and a large number of A-type viruses were found in patients from the US and Australia." Type B was the Wuhan strain and found across China and much of East Asia. Type C was found mainly in Europe.

In fan-fiction, there is canon and then there is head-canon. I leave it to you, esteemed readers, which version you prefer.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Madurai Padmanabhan Apr 13, 2020

The various comments in response are equally troubling as the appeal in the article.

Geopolitics needs a new framework. It cannot continue as a good versus evil narrative, wherein morality and construed character of political systems is accorded more valor than pragmatism.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
hong Koh Apr 12, 2020

In China when you write your address you first write country then state then county then city then street number then apartment then family name then first name.
In the USA you write your first name then family name and in sequence the exact opposite with country being last.
In China the country (all the Chinese people) is the most important concept of community and the individual comes last after the family name. In America the individual comes first and country (All the American people) comes last.
In China this is the Confucian concept of filial piety.
The Chinese tradition requires all Chinese to treasure the good of the community over their individual aspirations.
The Communist Party has around 100,000,000 members. Each one member is part of a family group that has at least 7 members of a family( 2 sets of grandparents, one set of parents and a kid) That means in this simplistic mind experiment over 700 million people are directly related to the Party. Then there are the extended families, government employees, retirees and SOE employees which would count up to over a billion people.
So as you can see the Party is the people and the people are the Party.
In a sense it is not gerrymandered democracy protecting the vested interests of the donor/lobbyist class like the USA but family representation on a national scale.
The Chinese people value social harmony over everything else. This is the social contract they have with their system of Governance. You give us harmony and opportunity and we expect you to quash any violations of the social contract to keep the peace.
So if y'all think for one New York minute that attacking China is endearing the Chinese people you are sadly mistaken. When you attack the Party you attack the 1.4 billion individual Chinese people who as consumers are now the world's largest retail market by far.
China's sovereign wealth fund was being tutored by Ackman and shorted the market two months ago. So who owns who owns who owns who???
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Wim Roffel Apr 12, 2020

I don't blame China for initially underplaying the crisis. Most Western countries did the same. If the crisis had started in the US we might be in a worse position now: China's experience with SARS more than made up for the harm caused by CCP censorship.

However, I don't see any Chinese leadership in this question. China's aggressive egoism - that we already know from the armed fishing boats in the South Chinese Sea - is now also visible in its handling of corona crisis. China is the factory of the world. Leadership would mean that it would pronounce itself responsible for supplying the world with adequate face masks, tests and other equipment. Instead we see the same power abuse where every Chinese shipment is presented as a favor.

China is making enemies now, not friends. And the main culprit is not Trump but China's leadership.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Apr 8, 2020

This comment was removed by a moderator. Replies to this comment may also be deleted. Please note that we moderate comments to ensure the conversation remains topically relevant. We appreciate well-informed comments and welcome your criticism and insight. Please be civil and avoid name-calling and ad hominem remarks.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Apr 6, 2020

This comment was removed by a moderator. Replies to this comment may also be deleted. Please note that we moderate comments to ensure the conversation remains topically relevant. We appreciate well-informed comments and welcome your criticism and insight. Please be civil and avoid name-calling and ad hominem remarks.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Apr 5, 2020

This comment was removed by a moderator. Replies to this comment may also be deleted. Please note that we moderate comments to ensure the conversation remains topically relevant. We appreciate well-informed comments and welcome your criticism and insight. Please be civil and avoid name-calling and ad hominem remarks.
- j. von Hettlingen Apr 22, 2020
  
  Since my comment has been removed, I can't see who you are.
  Anyway thanks for jumping to my defence. I deem my comment civil, but may have been unfavourably viewed by the author herself.
  A new reply to this comment has been posted.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Iva Bolan-Hayes Apr 5, 2020

Forward-thinking Chinese Leaders have swiftly responded to controversy and criticism falsely laid at their feet. Effective October 2019, the city formerly known as Wuhan has been renamed Chicago. Hubai has also been updated to Orange County. Henceforth, all mentions of the source of COVID-19 shall be expected to refer to it as the Chicago Virus, which has caused major harm to the entirety of Orange County. That is all.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Marty V Apr 5, 2020

Thank you for a thought provoking article. China clearly has a trust issue with Western leadership. Also as you state in your article there is "patriotic anger" toward the U.S. in China. Only when we deal with the sources of those divides will positive options become available.
American resentments stem from asymmetrical business development- Americans getting the benefit of lower cost goods, with wealthy Americans (Bloomberg types) getting rich, at the expense of our manufacturing base and a way of way for many Americans. There is hypocrisy in this sentiment. However the biggest source and perhaps more lasting source is the handling of the Corona virus in the initial stage. Can China overcome its lack of transparency and authoritarian approach to its people?
I'd be curious as to sources of "patriotic anger" beyond CCP directed anger. Is it directed toward the American people, our way of life, or is the narrative about the government or current administration? Thank You.
- Michael C Apr 7, 2020
  
  Great comment and question at the end! My view (from Hong Kong) is that it is CCP directed anger, with a narrative focused on the US government (current admin in particular. Too easy, I'm afraid), "imperialism" (real or perceived) and "100 years of shame".
  
  There is absolutely no anger towards the American way of life. Just look at all the students and rich ppl flocking to study and live in the US. In fact, the avg person in China very much aspires to have the US way of life (consumer / material oriented, but of course this is not all of American life). The young love Nike, Apple, NBA etc.
  A new reply to this comment has been posted.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Gregory Buls Apr 5, 2020

I like the pictures of cases and cases of defective medical gear heading west. Thanks, CHINA! You are wonderful global citizens.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Gregory Buls Apr 5, 2020

WAPO is reporting that Wuhan deaths were likely more than 40,000.
Had China not lied, tens of thousands would have survived elsewhere.

China is FINISHED as a credible international player, except as a friend to the poorest and most desperate regimes. Chinese citizens need to overthrow their murderous, psychopathic, sociopathic regime. Dark days ahead for CHINA.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Henry Miller Apr 5, 2020

First, the rest of the world would be complete fools to trust China's "help"--their notion of "moral" is "whatever's in China's interests."
Throughout this affair, China's actions have been singularly irresponsible and self-serving and there's no reason to think that they're going to be any more responsible or any less self-serving in the future.

As to "leadership," China doesn't want to "lead," China wants to dominate. China wants to "lead" in much the same way Napoleon and Hitler wanted to "lead"--by force.

We, the rest of the world, don't need China's "help," we need them to just go away. If the Chinese Communist Party want to lead-by-force their own country, it's entirely up to the Chinese people whether to go on tolerating it--though the people of Hong Kong seem not to be so tolerant. But the rest of the world needn't, and shouldn't, tolerate China's efforts to impose their "leadership" on us.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Gordon Monsen Apr 5, 2020

While there's a lot of interesting ideas here, it really seems to ignore the elephant in the room. This virus originated in China and they have hidden so much about the virus and its impact. Had either they not had "wet markets" and had their people not been allowed to do things like eating bats or alternatively had they not been experimenting with biochemical warfare at their level IV research facility in Wuhan, the world would not have had to cope with enormous numbers of deaths and had to shut down the global economy. When this is all over, the world will harbor an incredible amount of anger -- raw and growing anger -- at China. Many are already angry and this anger will only grow through time. It is absolutely inevitable. This was all China's fault. They are completely to blame. This is certainly not a moment for any sort of Chinese "leadership". This is a time for China to beg for the world's forgiveness and to do whatever the world asks. Which they won;t do. So, no one is going to buy anything from China for decades. No one is going to build a factory in China for decades. China is most likely to become more aggressive militarily and jeopardize world peace. No one is going to allow their continued military expansion in the China Sea. They have not only sown the seeds of an economic disaster in China, but the seeds for military with the rest of the world.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Ian Everhart Apr 5, 2020

"If there is one lesson that China should share with the world, it is that speed, transparency, accuracy, and scientific reliability are of the utmost importance when communicating about the COVID-19 crisis.... China should quietly win trust by helping the US and other countries, not out of strategic interest, but on moral grounds."

Sorry Ms. Jin, but this is a fantasy; China's initial cover-up of the virus from December - January was the product of a political system that has lies baked into its foundations, going back to lies about the early history of the CCP, lies about the CCP's exaggerated contributions in the War of Resistance against Japan (WW2), and so many more since then, such as the man-made mass famine of the Great Leap Forward, and so many crimes against humanity. This lengthy record of deceit is the core reason for the closed information environment of the country. There's no possibility for reforming this - Gorbachev tried through Glasnost, and the USSR collapsed within a few years.

COVID-19 is a turning point in world history. Only fools would trust the CCP or attribute moral values to them from here on out. The CCP's model of attracting foreign investment and trade since 1979 is definitively coming to an end. I understand you love your homeland, and the great cultural traditions of Chinese civilization. But your country is run by a criminal regime, that will continue to drag the reputation (and fortunes, and lives) of the Chinese people deeper into the abyss. The push-back from the West is only beginning; you'd do well to choose the correct side.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Chris Jones Apr 5, 2020

Things will never be the same. The World cried with China and sought to help send international infectious disease experts to help with the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid 19) outbreak. The CCP refused and destroyed samples, demolished the wet market in question, and persecuted the doctors who tried to warn China's citizens and the World. There are statements by CCP authorities that cause alarm that this was an accident, a rogue act, or deliberate contamination that originated from the level 2 lab in Wuhan or the level 4 lab on the outskirts. Even worse are the rumors that rampant organ harvesting from religious and political prisoners occurred.
Many countries are complaining about failures with 80% of the medical equipment China has supplied to several countries.
The American people have realized that China has monopolized the production of many essentials. There will be concerted efforts to rebuild American industry, manufacturing, pharmaceutical, and other areas of production in a new spirit of American Independence.
There is a growing food shortage throughout the World and America's farmers may well have to provide for China and other countries beset by locusts, bad weather, and insufficient planting because of the Wuhan coronavirus pandemic.
It appears that rapid tests, viable treatments, and possible vaccines will be readily available soon to counter the Wuhan coronavirus pandemic akthough the losses in people and economic vitality will be great. America will rebuild, but the economic and political relationship with China will never be the same as before the Wuhan coronavirus pandemic.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Dog Lover BOWOWOW Apr 4, 2020

China is a dictatorship that wants to control the planet. You are stupid to think otherwise.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Enrique Rojas Apr 4, 2020

China has a serious credibility problem. It sent defective tests to Spain and Italy. No one believes its reporting of Coronavirus cases. And it disposed of early whistleblowers who were trying to give the world a warning about the virus. No, this is not leadership. Not even close.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
mike Walker Apr 4, 2020

I appreciate your position as a foreign affairs expert. As many have said, this epidemic has changed the world. Things will never be the same. And China will never be trusted as a good faith nation. The wonderful Chinese people are led by a vicious, self serving, evil bunch of Communist autocrats. They are the enemy of the free world. Actions speak louder than words.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Reedasaurus . Apr 4, 2020

" Instead of congratulating itself on having pushed back COVID-19, China should quietly win trust by helping the United States and other countries, not out of strategic interest, but on moral grounds."

The first sentence, and it stopped me in my tracks.

"Congratulating itself for having pushed back COVID-19"?!? Seriously? Do you actually believe that? Do you actually believe the very low numbers of reported infections and deaths in China?!?

Then you go on to mention trust and morality? Like the Chinese have any of either to offer? This infection came from China, and it was made very much worse by the lying Chinese communist government. They lied, hundreds of thousands of lives were lost, and hundreds of millions of jobs destroyed. And now you want to talk about what an opportunity it is for China?!?

Seriously?
- Joe Bu Apr 5, 2020
  
  The West has to get over Butthurt. It’s possible... it took China about 150 years after the Opium Wars.
  
  Good luck.
  - Henry Miller Apr 5, 2020
    
    So COVID-19 is revenge for something that happened nearly two centuries ago? And in which, by the way, America had no involvement. If that is indeed the case, if China's collective memory is indeed that long and vindictive, that's even more reason the rest of the world shouldn't trust them.
    - Joe Bu Apr 5, 2020
      
      I’m American. I’m trying to help you buddy. Butthurt did China no good and it’s doing the West no good.
      A new reply to this comment has been posted.
    A new reply to this comment has been posted.
  - Ian Everhart Apr 5, 2020
    
    Your arrogance and chip on your shoulder sense of grievances are reminiscent of Germans between the 1920's and 1940's. They stopped talking that way in May 1945.
    A new reply to this comment has been posted.
  A new reply to this comment has been posted.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Val VanDegrift Apr 4, 2020

Unbelievable. China inflicts death 💀 And economic devastation on the world by known filthy disease ridden practices, followed by lied & deception, & now the propaganda begins that we shouldn’t be upset w China, or decouple our over-reliance but rather smile & increase our dependence on a the source of all death & misery. The world should take a hard look at what China has caused & take steps to be sure China can’t do it again.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
matthew617 Apr 4, 2020

While the Us is hardlly perfect-but China has to stop lying to get anywhere. Stonwalled, lied to word community for weeks, WHO is their parrot. Do you really believe they had no new organic cases? Does anyone really believe the case and death count? If so, why are there dozens of portable incinerators in Wuhan? Also, not sending defective defective test kits would help (like 80%).
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Raihan Rahee Apr 4, 2020

I think China should crosscheck the standard of medical supplies it produces. Some European countries are giving back some medical equipment such as face mask because of poor manufacturing.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Remi Chukwudi Okeke Apr 3, 2020

An interesting piece on morality in international relations, particularly in an era of global cataclysm.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.

https://prosyn.org/oAEajdOes

¿Es este el momento del liderazgo de China?

PS Events: What Economics is Missing

New Comment

Contact us

Log in/Register

¿Es este el momento del liderazgo de China?

PS Events: What Economics is Missing

Edit Newsletter Preferences

Set up Notification