La guerra y el medio ambiente

La preocupación acerca de las consecuencias medioambientales de la guerra probablemente comenzó después del lanzamiento de las primeras bombas atómicas sobre Hiroshima y Nagasaki al término de la Segunda Guerra Mundial, cuando nadie sabía cuánto duraría la contaminación radioactiva o qué medidas de limpieza debían tomarse. Durante la Guerra Fría, los efectos ambientales de una confrontación nuclear generalizada se convirtieron en materia de pronósticos y especulaciones, ilustrados por el concepto del "invierno nuclear".

No sólo las armas nucleares dieron origen a estos temores. El uso del Agente Amarillo y el Agente Naranja como defoliantes durante la Guerra de Vietnam generó un apasionado debate (y algunas investigaciones) acerca de tales efectos toxicológicos y ecológicos. Antes de la primera Guerra del Golfo en 1991, se discutieron los posibles efectos sobre el clima mundial si Irak incendiaba los pozos petroleros kuwaitíes, lo que se convirtió posteriormente en la principal imagen del efecto ambiental de dicha guerra.

Desde entonces se han hecho intentos por estudiar y documentar sistemáticamente las consecuencias ambientales de las guerras. Organizaciones internacionales como el Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente (PNUMA) han iniciado varios estudios acerca de las guerras de los Balcanes y de los varios conflictos que consumieron a Afganistán durante la década de los 90. Desgraciadamente, las guerras africanas (en el Congo, Ruanda y Burundi, Liberia, Sierra Leona y la Costa de Marfil) aún no reciben la atención que merecen.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/vS79f85/es;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now