mueller23_ZOLTAN MATHEPOOLAFP via Getty Images_orbanparliament

当心病毒式授权

Mar 31, 2020 Jan-Werner Mueller

普林斯顿—毫无疑问，冠状病毒是全球紧急状况。同样毫无疑问，政府将利用这一经济状况增加自己的权力。威胁解除后，其中一些政府可能也不会让出新获得的权力。

反对党要广泛参与用以解决这个百年一遇的公共卫生危机的政策制定，这一点很关键。但政府和反对党之间的界限不能以“国家团结”的名义模糊。不应该将反对党领导人的批评称为不合法的“内讧”。让反对党保持政府问责的机制必须得到强化而非削弱。

经济状况有两种效应：在民主国家，它们将权力向行政部门集中。主张新权力的领导人常常可以借助公民的支持。即便是一开始的表现堪称灾难的美国总统特朗普，也因为万众一心的情况而受益。

We hope you're enjoying Project Syndicate.

To continue reading, subscribe now.

Already have an account? Log in

Support High-Quality Commentary

For more than 25 years, Project Syndicate has been guided by a simple credo: All people deserve access to a broad range of views by the world's foremost leaders and thinkers on the issues, events, and forces shaping their lives. At a time of unprecedented uncertainty, that mission is more important than ever – and we remain committed to fulfilling it.

But there is no doubt that we, like so many other media organizations nowadays, are under growing strain. If you are in a position to support us, please subscribe now.

As a subscriber, you will enjoy unlimited access to our On Point suite of long reads and book reviews, Say More contributor interviews, The Year Ahead magazine, the full PS archive, and much more. You will also directly support our mission of delivering the highest-quality commentary on the world's most pressing issues to as wide an audience as possible.

By helping us to build a truly open world of ideas, every PS subscriber makes a real difference. Thank you.

Subscribe Now

new comment has been posted. new comments have been posted.

0 Comments on this paragraph, 2 in all 2 Comments on this article

j. von Hettlingen Mar 31, 2020

Jan-Werner Mueller warns against political leaders across the globe exploiting the coronavirus crisis to pass emergency laws and legislation to expand their power. He urges activist groups and opposition parties to step up their vigilance. They also need to ensure that checks and balances are robust to contain excessive executive power, and safeguard an effective functioning of the government, while preventing it from abusing and hanging onto power, once the crisis is over.
The author says in times of emergency the opposition must support appropriate measures proposed by the government, while holding it “strictly to account.” But the line between the two camps “must not be blurred” in the name of “national unity.” And a responsible head of state should not brand “criticism by opposition leaders” as “illegitimate ‘infighting.’” Meanwhile the “mechanisms that allow oppositions to hold governments accountable must be strengthened, not weakened.” Indeed, it is how a normal country works in a liberal democracy.
Yet in recent weeks we have seen Putin seeking to indefinitely extend his presidency, although the virus has since forced him to postpone a vote that could have allowed him to stay in power until 2036.
In Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu has been accused of delaying his impending court proceedings due to COVID-19, allowing him to remain in office. Security agencies have also been ordered to track users’ data without their consent.
The Hungarian parliament handed the country's populist, autocratic leader, Viktor Orban, the power to rule by decree for as long as he sees fit, and jailing journalists on trumped up charges, like disseminating false information or obstructing the state’s crisis response.
The pandemic legislation has the power to restrict people from gathering in large numbers, and angry citizens from taking to the streets. Urging people to observe “social distancing” and under the pretext of containing the spread of COVID-19, authoritarian leaders use the health hazard to ban protests and “repress legitimate forms of political dissent.” Although these measures seem “entirely reasonable,” they are a Trojan Horse, designed to do away with liberal democratic values.
The author says parliaments in liberal democracies have passed bills that give governments wide-ranging powers unseen before, the legislative and judicial branches must continue to function and serve the people, even during a country-wide lockdown. He points out “how crucial it is for democracies properly to institutionalize the role of an opposition,” advising activist groups and opposition parties to go online and perform their duties – as a form of conducting “distance democracy.”
The fear of an incremental erosion of democracy is real. Even established democracies like the US under Trump and the UK under Boris Johnson can be in danger, since the two leaders have showed autocratic streaks, like the desire to “claim powers to hold citizens in detention during the pandemic.”
Some political leaders suggest “plausible” solutions “in the face of the country’s lockdown and the temporary suspension of parliament.” New Zealand’s Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern proposes a “select committee chaired by the opposition leader, which can hold the government to account.”
The American law scholar Bruce Ackerman calls for an ingenious mechanism of a “super-majoritarian escalator”: laws and decrees can be renewed periodically, but only if ever larger majorities agree to do so. This would focus political debate on the question of whether a return from the new to the old normal is possible.”
He meant to cast the spotlight on the protection of basic rights, in an age of terrorism, when George W. Bush's "war on terror" under the "Patriot Act" was a means to an end.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Keevan Morgan Mar 31, 2020

I agree with the classical liberal headline stated premise of let's not cede unnecessary permanent power to the head of state because of a temporary crisis, and to be wary even a temporary grant of such power will be made permanent by the tyrant's overt action or the mute consent of the governed.

On the other hand, that's all that needs to be said. There is no reason to read this particular article beyond the sentence that Trump has been a disaster from the start.

The power-grabbers before Covid-19 were Pelosi and Schumer, Biden and the Sanders and all their allies. And, it is they who scream Trump is not taking on enough dictatorial power that they themselves seek to wield as early as January, 2021.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.

https://prosyn.org/CpVrYV7zh

Cookies and Privacy

当心病毒式授权

To continue reading, subscribe now.

Support High-Quality Commentary

New Comment

Email this piece to a friend

Contact us

Log in/Register

Cookies and Privacy

当心病毒式授权

To continue reading, subscribe now.

Support High-Quality Commentary

Edit Newsletter Preferences

Set up Notification