Bush’s Flawed Middle East Peace Plan

President Bush’s call for a conference of “moderates” to promote an Israeli-Palestinian peace demonstrates once again how intertwined the region’s problems are. So it is a fantasy to believe that peace can be concluded without the participation of Hamas and Syria.

That a summit in Damascus of the Middle East’s “axis of evil” – Iran, Hezbollah, Syria, and Hamas – was convened immediately following President George W. Bush’s call for a conference of “moderates” to promote an Israeli-Palestinian peace demonstrates once again how intertwined the region’s problems are. The Damascus meeting reflects Iran’s view of Israeli-Arab peace as a major strategic threat, because it would condemn it to isolation in a hostile Arab environment free of its conflict with Israel. The Iranians also sought the meeting to forge an alliance against a possible US attack on their country’s nuclear installations.

America has always known that the Middle East’s problems are interconnected, but for years it got its priorities wrong, because it failed to see that if there was an Archimedean point to the Middle East problem, it was to be found in the Palestinian issue, not the “War on Terror,” Iraq, or the need for Arab democracy. It took Bush six years of wrongheaded policies to finally admit that “Iraq is not the only pivotal matter in the Middle East.”

Bush’s initiative is a last-ditch effort to salvage America’s position in a region where it is on the defensive on all fronts. It is especially ironic that, in stark contrast to his own rhetoric, Bush’s call for a Middle East peace conference is a call to wage war against the party, Hamas, that won a democratic election, and to make peace with the loser, Fatah.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/f97lBDJ;