Stability on the Steppes

The essay, “Stabilizing the Stans,” does not accurately depict the region and my home of Kazakhstan, and does a disservice to those justifiably concerned about the fate of our war-weary neighbor, Afghanistan.

The essay is right about one thing: the Northern Distribution Network (NDN), which offers a more secure and reliable supply route for NATO supplies to the International Security Assistance Force, is becoming more essential.

That said, the essay’s unfortunate over-generalization that all Central Asian nations are essentially failed states is ill-informed. Although five countries belong to the same region, they are each unique – with different strengths and weaknesses. If one is to truly understand the realities on the ground in Central Asia, a more country-specific analysis is needed.

Kazakhstan unlike other countries in the Central Asia has achieved a lot as economically so politically. In the 20 short years since the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Republic of Kazakhstan has developed into an economic powerhouse and developing democracy – or in other words – an anchor of stability in a troubled part of the world.

Since its independence, Kazakhstan’s economy has grown more than eight-fold to USD $181 billion. It’s also the preferred destination for foreign direct investment, capturing 70 percent – or nearly USD $150 billion – of the total for the entire region.

In the midst of a global economic slowdown that has crippled more established states, Kazakhstan’s GDP growth in 2011 alone was 7.5 percent and unemployment is lower than the rates in the United States, Britain, France and Germany.

The World’s Opinion Page

Help support Project Syndicate’s mission

subscribe now

Also contrary to the essay’s claims, Kazakhstan’s economic success is not solely subject to the price of oil. Kazakhstan is the world’s largest producer of uranium, a global supplier of wheat, and has worked hard to further diversify its economy in to the financial services, construction and pharmaceutical industries.

We know, however, that our most important resource is our people. Kazakhstan has made every effort to meet our citizens’ needs for education, employment and general welfare while delivering economic opportunities for our growing middle class. Health spending has increased 10 times in the past decade. Higher pensions and more jobs have reduced the number of Kazakhs living in poverty.

This growing wealth has also translated into a five-fold increase in the average Kazakh citizen’s monthly wages over the last decade, and the establishment of something “failed states” seldom have, namely, a growing middle class.

Kazakhstan has been making major strides in the direction of democracy over the last decade. Following the 2004 and 2005 elections, new plans for political reform were meticulously developed and widely debated. Among the proposed changes: an enhanced role for Parliament, new political parties, a freer media and an efficient and transparent judiciary. Then, in 2007, major Constitutional reforms were announced including the election of new political parties in Parliament.

Progress can be slow and change is rarely achieved overnight. But in its brief history as an independent nation, the government of Kazakhstan has granted an extraordinary degree of political freedom to its people. We believe it has an enviable record, and one that our neighbors can follow with confidence.

We are proud, as well, of being a tolerant society where people of all backgrounds and religions are treated equally. In a nation with over 100 different ethnic groups, we have developed a culture of coexistence and unity rather than sectarian or ethnic conflict.

The essay is hardly the first to suggest that the Arab Spring might spread to Central Asia, but apart from the fact that we share a predominant religion – Islam – the two regions are distinct in almost every other way. A few isolated incidents of unrest in Central Asia is not comparable to the systemic issues that are facing Middle Eastern countries like Syria, Libya and Egypt -- no matter how hard one tries to connect the dots.

Kazakhstan’s focus on economic strength and increased prosperity for our citizens before democratic reforms is the reason. Without such strength, as we have seen repeatedly around the world, stability is put at risk and democratic reform can founder.

We, in Kazakhstan, are proud of all we have accomplished in such a short period of time. The prospects for Kazakhstan’s continued economic development and democratic reforms are favorable. We are equally confident that our progress will increase stability and opportunity for the entire Central Asian region in the longer term.

The author is the Republic of Kazakhstan's Ambassador to the United States of America.;
  1. Television sets showing a news report on Xi Jinping's speech Anthony Wallace/Getty Images

    Empowering China’s New Miracle Workers

    China’s success in the next five years will depend largely on how well the government manages the tensions underlying its complex agenda. In particular, China’s leaders will need to balance a muscular Communist Party, setting standards and protecting the public interest, with an empowered market, driving the economy into the future.

  2. United States Supreme Court Hisham Ibrahim/Getty Images

    The Sovereignty that Really Matters

    The preference of some countries to isolate themselves within their borders is anachronistic and self-defeating, but it would be a serious mistake for others, fearing contagion, to respond by imposing strict isolation. Even in states that have succumbed to reductionist discourses, much of the population has not.

  3.  The price of Euro and US dollars Daniel Leal Olivas/Getty Images

    Resurrecting Creditor Adjustment

    When the Bretton Woods Agreement was hashed out in 1944, it was agreed that countries with current-account deficits should be able to limit temporarily purchases of goods from countries running surpluses. In the ensuing 73 years, the so-called "scarce-currency clause" has been largely forgotten; but it may be time to bring it back.

  4. Leaders of the Russian Revolution in Red Square Keystone France/Getty Images

    Trump’s Republican Collaborators

    Republican leaders have a choice: they can either continue to collaborate with President Donald Trump, thereby courting disaster, or they can renounce him, finally putting their country’s democracy ahead of loyalty to their party tribe. They are hardly the first politicians to face such a decision.

  5. Angela Merkel, Theresa May and Emmanuel Macron John Thys/Getty Images

    How Money Could Unblock the Brexit Talks

    With talks on the UK's withdrawal from the EU stalled, negotiators should shift to the temporary “transition” Prime Minister Theresa May officially requested last month. Above all, the negotiators should focus immediately on the British budget contributions that will be required to make an orderly transition possible.

  6. Ksenia Sobchak Mladlen Antonov/Getty Images

    Is Vladimir Putin Losing His Grip?

    In recent decades, as President Vladimir Putin has entrenched his authority, Russia has seemed to be moving backward socially and economically. But while the Kremlin knows that it must reverse this trajectory, genuine reform would be incompatible with the kleptocratic character of Putin’s regime.

  7. Right-wing parties hold conference Thomas Lohnes/Getty Images

    Rage Against the Elites

    • With the advantage of hindsight, four recent books bring to bear diverse perspectives on the West’s current populist moment. 
    • Taken together, they help us to understand what that moment is and how it arrived, while reminding us that history is contingent, not inevitable

    Global Bookmark

    Distinguished thinkers review the world’s most important new books on politics, economics, and international affairs.

  8. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin Bill Clark/Getty Images

    Don’t Bank on Bankruptcy for Banks

    As a part of their efforts to roll back the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act, congressional Republicans have approved a measure that would have courts, rather than regulators, oversee megabank bankruptcies. It is now up to the Trump administration to decide if it wants to set the stage for a repeat of the Lehman Brothers collapse in 2008.