Is it a *Liberal* budget?

It being Budget Day yesterday in Britain I reached down Joseph Schumpeter’s weighty History of Economic Analysis (1954), which contains a short magnificent ode to Gladstonian finance. William Ewart Gladstone, four times Prime Minister and four times Chancellor of the Exchequer between 1853 and 1894, was a Tory who later became leader of the Liberal Party.

The Year Ahead 2018

The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

Order now

Reading Schumpeter’s praise of Gladstone I could not help wonder whether today's two-year old coalition of Conservatives and Liberal Democrats might surprise the country with unconditional support of the kind of radical retrenchment that Gladstone pursued in 1853, and to which both political parties are rightful heirs.

Wrote Schumpeter:

There was one man who not only united high ability with unparalleled opportunity but also knew how to turn budgets into political triumphs and who stands in history as the greatest English financier of economic liberalism, Gladstone…

The greatest feature of Gladstonian finance was that it expressed with ideal adequacy both the whole civilization and the needs of the time, ex visu of the conditions of the country to which it was to apply; or, to put it slightly differently, that it translated a social, political, and economic vision, which was comprehensive as well as historically correct, into the clauses of a set of co-ordinated fiscal measures…

Gladstonian finance was the finance of the system of natural liberty, laissez-faire, and free trade...

The most important thing was to remove fiscal obstructions to private activity. And for this, in turn, it was necessary to keep public expenditure low. Retrenchment was the victorious slogan of the day...

It means the reduction of the functions of the state to a minimum...

Retrenchment means rationalisation of the remaining functions of the state...

The resulting economic development would in addition, so it was believed, make social expenditures largely superfluous...

Equally important was to raise the revenue that would still have to be raised in such a way as to deflect economic behaviour as little as possible from what it would have been in the absence of all taxation ('taxation for revenue only')...

And since the profit motive and the propensity to save were considered of paramount importance for the economic progress of all classes, this meant in particular that taxation should as little as possible interfere with the net earnings of business...

As regards indirect taxes, the principle of least interference was interpreted by Gladstone to mean that taxation should be concentrated on a few important articles, leaving the rest free...

Last, but not least, we have the principle of the balanced budget...

Schumpeter did not view Gladstonian finance as a general recipe for all times. It was, however, the appropriate strategy whenever deficits rendered countries vulnerable to unpredictable crises of internal or external origin. Realistically, he said, crises are perhaps the only time for restructuring and clearing away “dead wood”.

Apart from the economic policies they both favoured, Gladstone and Schumpeter shared a natural kind of sympathy for the process of creative destruction. Gladstone famously had two great hobbies. He felled trees. Because of this, Randolph Churchill, father of Winston, complained of Gladstone’s apparent relish for destruction. And yet, Gladstone was a bibliophile who restored books. He brought down dying oaks in order to plant new trees. And he preserved books, which in those days depended on trees. He was creative in various ways. It is said that Gladstone read Treasure Island while on his way to brief Queen Victoria on affairs of state. The cultural critic, John Ruskin criticized Gladstone’s governments for not spending enough on the arts. Schumpeter retorted that Ruskin’s kind of criticism is typically blind to the “social system as a whole”. Ruskin could not see that Gladstone’s economic policies “allow people to earn so that they have the money to buy pictures or to enjoy leisure”, which, in the end, was just a different method for achieving the same ends.

A curious episode in Britain’s austerity debates reminded me of Gladstone. There was public controversy earlier this year over the fig trees that adorn the atrium of the building where British members of parliament have their offices. Reports that the trees are rented from a private company at an annual cost to the taxpayer of £32,500 were discussed as far afield as the Wall Street Journal. In the face of mounting pressure from the British Taxpayers Alliance, the House of Commons Commission promised to renegotiate the tree rental contract.

Momentarily I had a vision of William Ewart Gladstone wielding his axe in the atrium.

http://prosyn.org/bS5McAK;
  1. Chris J Ratcliffe/Getty Images

    The Brexit Surrender

    European Union leaders meeting in Brussels have given the go-ahead to talks with Britain on post-Brexit trade relations. But, as European Council President Donald Tusk has said, the most difficult challenge – forging a workable deal that secures broad political support on both sides – still lies ahead.

  2. The Great US Tax Debate

    ROBERT J. BARRO vs. JASON FURMAN & LAWRENCE H. SUMMERS on the impact of the GOP tax  overhaul.


    • Congressional Republicans are finalizing a tax-reform package that will reshape the business environment by lowering the corporate-tax rate and overhauling deductions. 

    • But will the plan's far-reaching changes provide the boost to investment and growth that its backers promise?


    ROBERT J. BARRO | How US Corporate Tax Reform Will Boost Growth

    JASON FURMAN & LAWRENCE H. SUMMERS | Robert Barro's Tax Reform Advocacy: A Response

  3. Murdoch's Last Stand?

    Rupert Murdoch’s sale of 21st Century Fox’s entertainment assets to Disney for $66 billion may mark the end of the media mogul’s career, which will long be remembered for its corrosive effect on democratic discourse on both sides of the Atlantic. 

    From enabling the rise of Donald Trump to hacking the telephone of a murdered British schoolgirl, Murdoch’s media empire has staked its success on stoking populist rage.

  4. Bank of England Leon Neal/Getty Images

    The Dangerous Delusion of Price Stability

    Since the hyperinflation of the 1970s, which central banks were right to combat by whatever means necessary, maintaining positive but low inflation has become a monetary-policy obsession. But, because the world economy has changed dramatically since then, central bankers have started to miss the monetary-policy forest for the trees.

  5. Harvard’s Jeffrey Frankel Measures the GOP’s Tax Plan

    Jeffrey Frankel, a professor at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government and a former member of President Bill Clinton’s Council of Economic Advisers, outlines the five criteria he uses to judge the efficacy of tax reform efforts. And in his view, the US Republicans’ most recent offering fails miserably.

  6. A box containing viles of human embryonic Stem Cell cultures Sandy Huffaker/Getty Images

    The Holy Grail of Genetic Engineering

    CRISPR-Cas – a gene-editing technique that is far more precise and efficient than any that has come before it – is poised to change the world. But ensuring that those changes are positive – helping to fight tumors and mosquito-borne illnesses, for example – will require scientists to apply the utmost caution.

  7. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now