The End of (Economic) History?

John Maynard Keynes thought that we could overcome the problem of scarcity, which underlies all economics. Was he right?

PARIS -- Some academic works, for reasons that are at least partly obscure, leave a persistent trace in intellectual history. Such is the case with John Maynard Keynes’s paper “Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren.”

The importance of Keynes’s paper consisted not so much in how he answered the questions he posed, but in the nature of the questions themselves. Could the very functioning of the capitalist system bring an end to the problem of scarcity – and hence to capitalism itself? What might people’s lives in such an era reasonably be expected to look like?

Keynes began to examine these questions with the calculus of compound interest and its spectacular outcome when applied to long periods. At a 2% rate of growth, any figure, including GDP, will increase 7.5-fold in a century. So, would the problem of scarcity – which underlies all economics – be resolved by such an increase?

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To continue reading, please log in or register now. After entering your email, you'll have access to two free articles every month. For unlimited access to Project Syndicate, subscribe now.

required

By proceeding, you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions.

Log in

http://prosyn.org/bjnOjPN;

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated cookie policy and privacy policy.