Dean Rohrer

El absurdo cautelar

PRINCETON – Muchas personas que abogan por medidas draconianas para contrarrestar el cambio climático basan su argumentación en el así llamado “principio cautelar”, que sostiene que cuando un posible desastre futuro sería de una gravedad inaceptable, es imperativo tomar medidas para prevenirlo. El análisis de coste-beneficio (es decir, comparar el coste de las medidas correctivas con los beneficios de corregir de evitar el desastre) ya no es permisible. Es necesario emprender acciones, no importa el coste.

Este principio hace que las personas aboguen por la adopción de medidas enormemente costosas para prevenir desastres todavía más enormes, pero cuya probabilidad es altamente incierta. Si un desastre es inaceptable, no importa lo poco seguros que estemos de que realmente ocurra, hay que dar pasos para evitarlo.

Como resultado de la confianza generalizada en el principio cautelar, los escenarios apocalípticos han llegado a predominar en el debate sobre el cambio climático. Es fácil imaginar desastres tan graves que sería razonable tomar medidas drásticas para su prevención, y quienes sostienen esta visión pueden asustar fácilmente al público con esos desastres imaginarios. Nadie sabe lo suficiente sobre las causas del cambio climático como para demostrar que un desastre imaginario es imposible.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/tJ7TLSb/es;
  1. Patrick Kovarik/Getty Images

    The Summit of Climate Hopes

    Presidents, prime ministers, and policymakers gather in Paris today for the One Planet Summit. But with no senior US representative attending, is the 2015 Paris climate agreement still viable?

  2. Trump greets his supporters The Washington Post/Getty Images

    Populist Plutocracy and the Future of America

    • In the first year of his presidency, Donald Trump has consistently sold out the blue-collar, socially conservative whites who brought him to power, while pursuing policies to enrich his fellow plutocrats. 

    • Sooner or later, Trump's core supporters will wake up to this fact, so it is worth asking how far he might go to keep them on his side.
  3. Agents are bidding on at the auction of Leonardo da Vinci's 'Salvator Mundi' Eduardo Munoz Alvarez/Getty Images

    The Man Who Didn’t Save the World

    A Saudi prince has been revealed to be the buyer of Leonardo da Vinci's "Salvator Mundi," for which he spent $450.3 million. Had he given the money to the poor, as the subject of the painting instructed another rich man, he could have restored eyesight to nine million people, or enabled 13 million families to grow 50% more food.

  4.  An inside view of the 'AknRobotics' Anadolu Agency/Getty Images

    Two Myths About Automation

    While many people believe that technological progress and job destruction are accelerating dramatically, there is no evidence of either trend. In reality, total factor productivity, the best summary measure of the pace of technical change, has been stagnating since 2005 in the US and across the advanced-country world.

  5. A student shows a combo pictures of three dictators, Austrian born Hitler, Castro and Stalin with Viktor Orban Attila Kisbenedek/Getty Images

    The Hungarian Government’s Failed Campaign of Lies

    The Hungarian government has released the results of its "national consultation" on what it calls the "Soros Plan" to flood the country with Muslim migrants and refugees. But no such plan exists, only a taxpayer-funded propaganda campaign to help a corrupt administration deflect attention from its failure to fulfill Hungarians’ aspirations.

  6. Project Syndicate

    DEBATE: Should the Eurozone Impose Fiscal Union?

    French President Emmanuel Macron wants European leaders to appoint a eurozone finance minister as a way to ensure the single currency's long-term viability. But would it work, and, more fundamentally, is it necessary?

  7. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now