Poverty, Social Spending, and IMF Programs: Myth vs. Reality

WASHINGTON, D.C.: An oft-repeated claim is that the IMF is responsible for increasing human misery in developing countries - in particular, by forcing countries to cut spending on programs like health and education. But riots and repetition do not make such claims true. At best, such accusations are out of date; at worst, they are ideological grandstanding.

The record, indeed, is clear: in 66 countries with IMF programs, between 1985 and 1998, per capita spending on health and education rose by more than 2% per year after inflation. These numbers reflect the fact that IMF advice to countries facing budgetary pressures emphasizes the importance of sustaining expenditures on health and education. The Fund urges that savings be found in unproductive spending - meaning excessive military spending, subsidies for the well-to-do, and inefficient administrative practices. Indeed, military spending (in the 41 countries where the IMF has data) fell by almost 1% of GDP between 1993 and 1997.

Low-income countries have posted larger gains in health and education spending than other countries under IMF programs. This difference will become even more pronounced as increasing amounts of debt relief are delivered under the Initiative for Heavily-Indebted Poor Countries (HIPCs), because a principal condition for this assistance is that money saved is channeled into poverty reduction.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To continue reading, please log in or register now. After entering your email, you'll have access to two free articles every month. For unlimited access to Project Syndicate, subscribe now.

required

By proceeding, you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions.

Log in

http://prosyn.org/6ydSn7I;

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated cookie policy and privacy policy.