kaletsky72_FRANCOIS MORIPOOLAFP via Getty Images_macronmerkelcoronavirusconference

English

Europe’s Hamiltonian Moment

May 21, 2020 Anatole Kaletsky

The proposed sum for the recovery fund proposed by French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Angela Merkel is small change in an era when politicians and central bankers conjure up trillions almost daily. But, if adopted, the proposal might be remembered as the moment when Europe became a genuine political federation.

LONDON – The new Franco-German proposal for a €500 billion ($547 billion) European recovery fund could turn out to be the most important historic consequence of the coronavirus. It is even conceivable that the deal struck between German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Emmanuel Macron might one day be remembered as the European Union’s “Hamiltonian moment,” comparable to the 1790 agreement between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson on public borrowing, which helped to turn the United States, a confederation with little central government, into a genuine political federation.

Admittedly, this sounds hyperbolic. The proposed sum for the recovery fund is small change in an era when politicians and central bankers conjure up trillions almost daily. And what about the gulf between words and action throughout the EU’s history? Skepticism about the Franco-German proposal is certainly understandable and may prove justified.

The plan amounts to only 3% of the EU’s GDP, compared with the 15% of GDP already committed by Germany to industrial support. Creating any EU recovery plan will require unanimous support from the EU’s 27 member countries – and this will involve unseemly late-night squabbles between the self-styled “Frugal Four” northern governments (the Netherlands, Austria, Finland, and Sweden), which have vehemently opposed funding for Mediterranean EU members which, according to Wopke Hoekstra, the Dutch Finance Minister, have mainly themselves to blame for “failing to reform.”

We hope you're enjoying Project Syndicate.

To continue reading, subscribe now.

Already have an account? Log in

Support High-Quality Commentary

For more than 25 years, Project Syndicate has been guided by a simple credo: All people deserve access to a broad range of views by the world's foremost leaders and thinkers on the issues, events, and forces shaping their lives. At a time of unprecedented uncertainty, that mission is more important than ever – and we remain committed to fulfilling it.

But there is no doubt that we, like so many other media organizations nowadays, are under growing strain. If you are in a position to support us, please subscribe now.

As a subscriber, you will enjoy unlimited access to our On Point suite of long reads, book reviews, and insider interviews; Big Picture topical collections; Say More contributor interviews; Opinion Has It podcast features; The Year Ahead magazine, the full PS archive, and much more. You will also directly support our mission of delivering the highest-quality commentary on the world's most pressing issues to as wide an audience as possible.

By helping us to build a truly open world of ideas, every PS subscriber makes a real difference. Thank you.

Subscribe Now

Anatole Kaletsky

Writing for PS since 1995
75 Commentaries

Anatole Kaletsky is Chief Economist and Co-Chairman of Gavekal Dragonomics. A former columnist at the Times of London, the International New York Times and the Financial Times, he is the author of Capitalism 4.0: The Birth of a New Economy in the Aftermath of Crisis, which anticipated many of the post-crisis transformations of the global economy. His 1985 book, Costs of Default, became an influential primer for Latin American and Asian governments negotiating debt defaults and restructurings with banks and the IMF.

new comment has been posted. new comments have been posted.

0 Comments on this paragraph, 13 Comments on this article

Luc Devries May 30, 2020

Surely this is a no brainer, borrowing at 0.5% or less by issuing perpetual bonds or consols (call them what you like).
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Henk Crop May 24, 2020

We do not need a Hamilton moment in the EU. That moment is seen as the act that turned in 1790 the USA from a confederation with a little central government, into a genuine political federation ( a bloc).
Given the diversity of the EU members, which makes it uncomaparable to the USA, it has to determine its own future.
The EU began as the successful common market called the EEC. By the decision to form a political EU and in particular by the implementation of the Euro the EU has moved on to the wrong track.
The EU has lost its competitiveness, decisions are not made, frictions between members increase, cohesion is lost.
A crises is also often the right moment to bring about changes.
My suggestion is to prepare a plan for a new EU.
A plan that will make the EU more competitive, that will make it a lean and dynamic organisation able to meet the challenges in to-days rapidly changing world.
It is of vital importance for the less competitive members as well as the entire EU that competitivity significantly increases.
Between 2009-2017 the EU economy shrank by 2,4 %. Over the same period the US economy increased by 39 %, the Chinese by 139 %.
The EU could significantly improve in the clearity of its organisation and in the relationships with the EU members.
Therefore I suggest that the EU members in the top 10 of the Global Competitiveness Index of 2018 form a group to draw up such plan.
These members are: Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark.
This Juli Germany wil be leading the EU. It would add to the legacy of mrs. Merkel if she could launch such a group.
- Joe Ryan May 28, 2020
  
  A small point on the U.S.'s political structure. While Mr. Crop is fair in saying that there was "little central government" under the Articles of Confederation (he might just as well have said "no central government"), what the U.S. Constitution did was to abolish a "federation" of independent states and create a USG that is sovereign over all U.S. territory, including lots of territory that was not part of any state.
  
  Most of the present U.S. states were created by the USG out of U.S. territory by legally permitting people who were already U.S. citizens to migrate to those territories for the purpose of getting Congress's permission to organize new states. (In a couple cases, U.S. citizens jumped the legal migration gun, but with the same intent.)
  
  Indiana, from where I write, hardly federated itself with other states.
  
  U.S. governance needs to be seen in the context of the vision of a continental empire, starting with the trans-Appalachian land won by war from (sequentially) France, Great Britain, and the indigenous. That's a major sense in which it differs from present-day Europe's case.
  A new reply to this comment has been posted.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Michael Hullevad May 24, 2020

Although the USD is the common instrument of "money" for all states in the union interest rates are not universal. They vary a lot between the states depending on performance. The financial market sets the interest!
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Andrei Mocearov May 23, 2020

There is no word about taxes in this Merkel-Macron plan. It's only about borrowing against future contributions of the Member States. Therefore, there is no Hamilton moment. It's rather Wall Street moment. A consolidation of the supremacy of the financial markets rule over republican rule.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Henry Rech May 23, 2020

It's difficult to believe that the wily Merkel would accept such a proposition.

Perhaps she fully expects other northern European states to pipe up and scuttle the proposal.

She gets to look states-woman-like but the proposal founders (as some might expect she might prefer to see).
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
j. von Hettlingen May 22, 2020

Anatole Kaletsky says the €500 bn ($547 bn) “European Recovery Fund” jointly proposed by Emmanuel Macron and Angela Merkel, could turn out to be “the most important historic consequence” of Covid-19, and might one day be remembered as Europe’s “Hamiltonian moment” – comparable to the agreement on public borrowing between Thomas Jefferson and his political nemesis Alexander Hamilton. The Compromise of 1790 helped – just as the assumption of state debt by the government – transform the US, a confederation with little central government, into a genuine political federation.
Whether an emerging deal in Europe could complete the continent’s unfinished integration – a fiscal union – remains to be seen. A progress toward that end is expected to be slow, fitful, incremental. Yet a monetary union with only relatively loosely coordinated economic and fiscal policies is not powerful enough to prevent the kind crises the Eurozone has seen. Its member states need to be more agile, and pool their economic strength, making financial backstops more flexible to contain market turbulences etc.
The recovery fund – a common debt instrument to be administered through the EU’s budget, financed by EU-issued debt and funneled to the regions worst hit by Covid-19, including Italy and Spain – should be a grant, not a loan, which would avoid increasing the debts of the economies already weak before the pandemic. Both Macron and Merkel had made concession: Initially Macron wanted a trillion or more. But such grants would probably be too much for Merkel to swallow on behalf of her fellow taxpayers.
Nevertheless the proposed sum – €500 bn – is a paltry compared to the €1.1 trillion rescue package approved by the Upper House of Germany's Parliament to shield Europe's largest economy from the impact of the pandemic. Members of the European Parliament have recently approved a resolution calling for a €2 trillion recovery fund to rebuild Europe’s economy, after repeated calls from Italy for the issue of "coronabonds" - common eurozone bonds - to demonstrate the bloc’s solidarity.
Teem with enthusiasm the author says the Merkel-Macron deal is “a potential game changer,” because it involves “three crucial innovations, which may sound tediously technical but will vastly increase the flexibility of EU fiscal policy and could ultimately transform European politics in a way that really proves comparable to the Hamilton-Jefferson deal.” Now the two are publicly “committed” to this “financial mechanism,” and they must “deliver or suffer enormous loss of face.”
Whether Macron and Merkel can convince all the other 25 national leaders to go along with their idea is uncertain. The 17 nations of the eurozone understand that they must more fully collectivise responsibility for public debt and cede some control over their finances to a central authority. The current debt crisis – the threat of a default by a major nation, the possible splintering of the monetary union – hangs like the Sword of Damocles over their heads.
Nevertheless for Germany in particular, even this first step already amounts to a dramatic change. A country that has consistently rejected any notion of a European “transfer union” or “mutualised borrowing” is now pushing for a soft and temporary form of both. Merkel and the German establishment have been genuinely shaken by polls showing Italians turning into Euroskeptics, and by the spectre of the EU becoming irrelevant or even failing outright. Berlin’s foreign policy is premised on both transatlantic and European integration. With the US-German relationship already turning sour, the prospect of a dissolving EU constitutes an existential fear across the country.
Despite a surge in popularity, Merkel personally and her compatriots generally remain as reluctant as ever to assume the mantle of European hegemony. But she has clearly decided that Germany must at least be seen to assume its traditional position again as co-rider of the Franco-German “tandem” that had pulled Europe forward since the 1950s.
The author’s detailed plan on how the recovery fund be financed looks good on paper. It is still unclear how to put it into practice. Even if the usual suspects, the self-styled “Frugal Four” in the north – Austria, Finland, Sweden and the Netherlands – would come on board of the Franco-German Tandem, there is no guarantee that their leaders will have the support of their voters. Like the Germans, they are fiscally conservative and philosophically opposed to mutual debt and transfers within Europe. They are especially aghast at the idea that the new fund should give out grants rather than loans.
- jose sousa May 24, 2020
  
  An interesting overall picture of what has been going on and what needs to change (namely in respect to a common fiscal policy).
  But unless political leaders put the EU interest above their short-term political national interests / careers, the EU breakdown initiated in in 2009 will continue its tendence. Maybe now we can all find a turning point, or simply let de disagregation continue.
  A new reply to this comment has been posted.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Gerard Burke May 22, 2020

Without any support from the electorate in the nation states or political mandate, its not exactly hard to see this leading to anything other than another big backlash. It is certainly not a Hamiltonian moment. Macron is perfect example. The guy is deeply unpopular in France with disastrous approval ratings. Its actually hard to believe how unpopular he is inside France, yet instead of moving to address French issues he continues to push and push for 'more Europe'. In opinion polling, the French electorate have become more and more eurosceptic every year.
It has become clear that the EU elite politicians like Macron and Merkel have lost touch with the views of their electorates. They are continuing to push integrationist policies too much and the people will not accept it. They did not vote for it. Alexander Hamilton was a great statesman, politician, legal scholar, military commander, lawyer, banker, and economist - Emmanuel Macron is nothing but an arrogant, out of touch and failing French President, who his own electorate have completely lost confidence in (and a majority despise). To compare him to Alexander Hamilton of 'Europe' is ludicrous.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Per Kurowski May 22, 2020

Would Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson on public borrowing have, for the risk weighted bank capital requirements, agreed on assigning all of its states a 0% risk weight, even though none could print dollars?
That’s what EU did to the Eurozone’s debts
https://teawithft.blogspot.com/2019/06/the-still-ticking-0-risk-weight.html
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Henk Crop May 21, 2020

I do not think the 500 million Euro grant will make a historic event.
It does not address the issues that keep the EU divided.
It is meant to help fighting a natural disaster rather than flaws in economic management.

Besides, the corrona pandemic demonstrated well the status of European Integration.
Each Government took its own steps to fight the virus.
What is more. The people turned to their own Govenment for protection, not to the EU.
It showed the EU project once more as a chess game by and for the elite.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Bernhard Kopp May 21, 2020

Considering the constitutional and institutional set-up of the EU, the Macron/Merkel Plan will bring the EU deeper into the " post-democratic, federalist, executive dictatorship" as Jürgen Habermas called the EU. There is nothing Hamiltonian about it. We already have an ECB balance sheet, we have an excessive amount of club-med-debt papers with French financial institutions, and we have target-2-balances at national central banks, some with accounts receivable and others with accounts payable. We may be entering a new phase of animosity and hatred between European peoples as soon as broader parts of the population start to realise who finances what and where. I sincerely hope that said plan will not stand.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Jamel Saadaoui May 21, 2020

Without federal taxation powers and a no bailout clause for MS, quite difficult to call this moment, a Hamiltonian moment.

Some historical perspectives here : https://www.jamelsaadaoui.com/europes-hamiltonian-moment-again/
A new reply to this comment has been posted.

https://prosyn.org/z5kbIzf

Cookies and Privacy

Europe’s Hamiltonian Moment

To continue reading, subscribe now.

Support High-Quality Commentary

Spain Is Leading the Way on Perpetual Bonds

New Comment

Email this piece to a friend

Contact us

Log in/Register

Cookies and Privacy

Europe’s Hamiltonian Moment

To continue reading, subscribe now.

Support High-Quality Commentary

Edit Newsletter Preferences

Set up Notification