Bank of Italy Ullstein Bild/Getty Images

Making Fiscal Money Work

Proposals for a new system of “fiscal money” have increasingly appeared in political debates in Italy, where budget constraints and a lack of monetary sovereignty have tied policymakers’ hands. If it is properly designed, such a system could substantially boost economic output and public revenues at little to no cost.

ROME – In a recent commentary, Yanis Varoufakis of the University of Athens pointed out the merits of giving national governments a greater say in domestic money creation. Varoufakis calls for a new parallel payments system based on “fiscal money,” or money backed by future taxes, and he proposes a complex mechanism for creating such money.

In response, we would direct readers to our own fiscal-money proposal, which would be simpler and easier to adopt than the system Varoufakis describes. We devised the idea in our “Manifesto for Italy” in 2014, when we were looking for a policy instrument that could revive aggregate demand in an economy with limited fiscal space and no monetary sovereignty. As we argued then, such an instrument would allow Italy to recover from its economic crisis without leaving the eurozone or violating European Union rules.

Our proposal evolved into a widely read e-book and a series of articles, in which we developed a rigorous definition of fiscal money, and simulated a fiscal-money program using Italian economic data. We also considered how fiscal money would work in different contexts, by comparing our proposal to various parallel-currency proposals for Greece, and to the economic policies of Hjalmar Schacht, the architect of Germany’s economic recovery in the 1930s.

Fiscal-money proposals now feature heavily in Italian political debates, especially among major opposition parties such as former Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi’s Forward Italy (Forza Italia), the Five Star Movement, and the Northern League (Lega Nord). Whereas some see fiscal money as a potential complement to the euro, others see it as a means for withdrawing Italy from the eurozone altogether.

Under our proposal, the Italian government would issue “tax rebate certificates” (TRCs) granting reductions in future payments to the state (taxes, duties, social contributions, and so forth) in amounts equal to their nominal value. TRCs would be redeemable at a later date – say, two years after issuance – but they would also have an immediate value, because they would represent a guaranteed future claim. A €100 ($120) TRC that is issued today would be worth the same €100 when it is redeemed two years hence; but, in the meantime, it would trade at a small discount.

To ensure that a TRC’s market value tracks with its nominal price at all times, the government would pay a positive interest rate on TRC holdings. It would also establish a national payment system, whereby TRCs could be exchanged for goods and services from suppliers who accept them, or for euros and other assets. With this system in place, the government could then issue TRCs, free of charge, directly to workers, companies, or disadvantaged social groups, or use them to fund public investments and welfare programs.

The World’s Opinion Page

Help support Project Syndicate’s mission

subscribe now

Under our proposal, public- and private-sector agents would have more spending capacity, and domestic firms would be able to lower their labor costs. And this, in turn, would reduce trade deficits, by making domestic firms more competitive versus imports.

TRC issuances could thus be calibrated to close a country’s output gap. For example, in 2018, the Italian government could start issuing TRCs worth €30 billion per year, and then expand the annual total to €100 billion in three years. The first round of TRCs would have a stimulus effect during their two-year deferral period, because increased private-sector spending would push up output. And because large output gaps and low interest rates tend to have a multiplier effect on increases to income, the TRC issuance would cover its own fiscal costs by boosting public revenues.

Best of all, TRCs would not violate the European Central Bank’s monopoly over the euro as legal tender. TRCs are not claims to future reimbursements, so they do not constitute public debt as defined by Eurostat. That means governments can issue TRCs without running afoul of EU treaties and laws governing public liabilities, because they would not be increasing their risk of defaulting.

To be sure, TRCs would weaken fiscal budgets over time if they did not stimulate sufficient economic activity (and thus boost public revenues). But to prevent that outcome, TRC issuances could be accompanied by conditional tax increases or spending cuts at the time of redemption, depending on whether the government is running a deficit. These measures would then automatically expire as soon as the TRCs started to fuel enough economic expansion to cover their own fiscal costs.

So, even in a hypothetical (and virtually impossible) worst-case scenario, in which TRCs have no expansionary effect at all – that is, if all beneficiaries were to stow them “under the mattress” and wait for the rebates in 2020 – they would still be budget-neutral with the right safeguards in place.

All told, TRCs represent a risk-free proposition. In Italy, where the economy remains weak and fragile, they would most likely induce faster and more robust growth, while restoring stability to the country’s beleaguered financial sector.;
  1. Television sets showing a news report on Xi Jinping's speech Anthony Wallace/Getty Images

    Empowering China’s New Miracle Workers

    China’s success in the next five years will depend largely on how well the government manages the tensions underlying its complex agenda. In particular, China’s leaders will need to balance a muscular Communist Party, setting standards and protecting the public interest, with an empowered market, driving the economy into the future.

  2. United States Supreme Court Hisham Ibrahim/Getty Images

    The Sovereignty that Really Matters

    The preference of some countries to isolate themselves within their borders is anachronistic and self-defeating, but it would be a serious mistake for others, fearing contagion, to respond by imposing strict isolation. Even in states that have succumbed to reductionist discourses, much of the population has not.

  3.  The price of Euro and US dollars Daniel Leal Olivas/Getty Images

    Resurrecting Creditor Adjustment

    When the Bretton Woods Agreement was hashed out in 1944, it was agreed that countries with current-account deficits should be able to limit temporarily purchases of goods from countries running surpluses. In the ensuing 73 years, the so-called "scarce-currency clause" has been largely forgotten; but it may be time to bring it back.

  4. Leaders of the Russian Revolution in Red Square Keystone France/Getty Images

    Trump’s Republican Collaborators

    Republican leaders have a choice: they can either continue to collaborate with President Donald Trump, thereby courting disaster, or they can renounce him, finally putting their country’s democracy ahead of loyalty to their party tribe. They are hardly the first politicians to face such a decision.

  5. Angela Merkel, Theresa May and Emmanuel Macron John Thys/Getty Images

    How Money Could Unblock the Brexit Talks

    With talks on the UK's withdrawal from the EU stalled, negotiators should shift to the temporary “transition” Prime Minister Theresa May officially requested last month. Above all, the negotiators should focus immediately on the British budget contributions that will be required to make an orderly transition possible.

  6. Ksenia Sobchak Mladlen Antonov/Getty Images

    Is Vladimir Putin Losing His Grip?

    In recent decades, as President Vladimir Putin has entrenched his authority, Russia has seemed to be moving backward socially and economically. But while the Kremlin knows that it must reverse this trajectory, genuine reform would be incompatible with the kleptocratic character of Putin’s regime.

  7. Right-wing parties hold conference Thomas Lohnes/Getty Images

    Rage Against the Elites

    • With the advantage of hindsight, four recent books bring to bear diverse perspectives on the West’s current populist moment. 
    • Taken together, they help us to understand what that moment is and how it arrived, while reminding us that history is contingent, not inevitable

    Global Bookmark

    Distinguished thinkers review the world’s most important new books on politics, economics, and international affairs.

  8. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin Bill Clark/Getty Images

    Don’t Bank on Bankruptcy for Banks

    As a part of their efforts to roll back the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act, congressional Republicans have approved a measure that would have courts, rather than regulators, oversee megabank bankruptcies. It is now up to the Trump administration to decide if it wants to set the stage for a repeat of the Lehman Brothers collapse in 2008.