Comments 2

¿Fomenta la austeridad el desarrollo económico?

Jan 18, 2012 Robert J. Shiller

NEW HAVEN – En su clásica Fábula de las abejas o A vicios privados beneficios públicos (1724), Bernard Mandeville, el filósofo y satírico británico de origen holandés, describió –en verso– una sociedad próspera (de abejas) que de repente optó por hacer de la austeridad una virtud y abandonó todo el exceso de gasto y el consumo derrochador. Entonces, ¿qué ocurrió?

¡La propiedad despreciada,

abandonadas las glebas,

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To read this article from our archive, please log in or register now. After entering your email, you'll have access to two free articles from our archive every month. For unlimited access to Project Syndicate, subscribe now.

Featured

The End of Scandinavian Non-Alignment

Oct 17, 2018 Carl Bildt
The Martyrdom of Jamal Khashoggi

Oct 15, 2018 Daoud Kuttab
The Brexit Endgame

Oct 16, 2018 Robert Skidelsky
People vs. Money in America’s Midterm Elections

Oct 11, 2018 Joseph E. Stiglitz
The Big Blockchain Lie

Oct 15, 2018 Nouriel Roubini

Robert J. Shiller

Writing for PS since 2003
122 Commentaries

Robert J. Shiller, a 2013 Nobel laureate in economics, is Professor of Economics at Yale University and the co-creator of the Case-Shiller Index of US house prices. He is the author of Irrational Exuberance, the third edition of which was published in January 2015, and, most recently, Phishing for Phools: The Economics of Manipulation and Deception, co-authored with George Akerlof.

new comment has been posted. new comments have been posted.

0 Comments on this paragraph, 2 in all 2 Comments on this article

Helena Hessel Jan 26, 2012

I do not agree that the issue is purely statistical. The
important issue is a 'qualitative' aspect of deficits. What are the reasons for government running/increasing/decreasing deficits? In the recent crisis, rising deficits in Iceland and/ or Ireland are 'qualitatively' very different from those in Greece or Portugal, for example. 'Putting' all deficits into the same basket and running a regression leads to confusing
results and interpretations.
If rising deficits results from the cut in taxes (benefitting mostly) rich (as in the U.S before the crisis), for example, the cut in spending to reduce them would lead to serious drop in growth. The issue , at hand, is really more political than a problem of uncontrolled experiment.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Robert Goldschmidt Jan 25, 2012

The author begs the question of how we measure a country's economic strength. GDP and corporate profits are not the best measure as they are distorted by deficits and trade. Perhaps the most accurate measure is aggregate wage-based demand. But even this measure needs to be adjusted (i.e. intrinsic wage-based demand) by removing the wages attributable to government deficits.

Looked at in this light, the effects of policy changes can be more easily anticipated and measured. For example, one can show that intrinsic demand has been falling for four decades in the US and that outsourcing to low-wage countries, automation and oil depletion are the structural sources of demand destruction.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.

http://prosyn.org/RcPFzzg/es;

Email required

Password required Remember me?

Facebook

Twitter

¿Fomenta la austeridad el desarrollo económico?

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Featured

The End of Scandinavian Non-Alignment

The Martyrdom of Jamal Khashoggi

The Brexit Endgame

People vs. Money in America’s Midterm Elections

The Big Blockchain Lie

New Comment

Email this piece to a friend

Contact us

Is Hothouse Earth Avoidable?

The End of Scandinavian Non-Alignment

Will Italy Sink Europe?

PS [In Depth]: Deconstructing the Urbanization Challenge

The “No-Growth” Prescription for Misery

The Case Against National AI Strategies

America’s Ongoing Civil War

PS. Explain This: The Animal Spirits of Women Entrepreneurs

Cookies and Privacy

Log in/Register