Politics

Разоружение военизированной власти Египта

Jul 18, 2013 Omar Ashour

ЛОНДОН – Сегодняшний кризис в Египте называют самым сильным в его истории. Но в действительности он поразительно напоминает предыдущий такой эпизод, произошедший почти 60 лет назад.

28 февраля 1954 года почти миллион протестующих взяли в осаду каирский Дворец Абдин, в то время использовавшийся Гамалем Абделем Насером и другими руководителями переворота июля 1952. Основными требованиями протестующих было восстановление хрупких демократических институтов Египта, освобождение политических заключенных и возвращение армии в казармы.

Двухмесячный кризис 1954 года был вызван смещением президента Египта генерала Мохаммеда Нагиба Насером и его фракцией. Как и в 2013 году, движение «Братья-мусульмане» было в самой гуще событий, мобилизовавшись для защиты свергнутого Нагиба. Но после обещаний Насера провести выборы в июне 1954 года и передать власть гражданским лицам один из лидеров «Братьев-мусульман» Абд аль-Кадр Оде призвал протестующих расходиться.

To continue reading, register now.

Subscribe now for unlimited access to everything PS has to offer.

As a registered user, you can enjoy more PS content every month – for free.

Already have an account? Log in

Introductory Offer: Save 30% on PS Digital

Subscribe now to gain greater access to Project Syndicate – including every commentary and our entire On Point suite of subscriber-exclusive content – starting at less than $5 per month.

Subscribe Now

new comment has been posted. new comments have been posted.

0 Comments on this paragraph, 5 Comments on this article

Wim Roffel Jul 24, 2013

Omar Ashour writes "But, once elected officials are removed by force, the outcomes are rarely favorable for democracy."

There is one word too much in this sentence. It is the word "elected". Every time you overthrow a government you set the setting for the next overthrow.

If Egypt had had a negotiated transition of power instead of an US aided coup against Mubarak you would now have a tradition of negotiations (what would have made it more likely that Morsi reacted to the unrest) and no tradition of overthrowing governments with demonstrations - what would have made the present coup less likely.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Mohamed Metwally Jul 24, 2013

What happend in Egypt in 2013 is a new style and redefinition of People's revolution backed by Military support.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Mohamed Afify Jul 22, 2013

This is not the right comparison to make. Mursi is a terrorist and he did not feed the egyptian people. The egyptian people has made their decision and ousted the brotherhood group and its terrorist allies. How dare you inviting the american to get involved. You are just similar to idiots who is calling that and no wonder you might be from the brotherhood yourself.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Sherif Mansour Jul 22, 2013

Ironically the Military’s power can be challenged by the same gambit they pulled of this month. A democratically elected government, backed by laws written in parliament and the general public can enforce changes on the government. That future government (fingers crossed) can also negotiate foreign policy with the US and change the terms of the US aid package (transferring the control for the AID from military to civilian department). It will not be without resistance but it will be backed by legitimacy, popular support and it would be out of the army’s control (ie they will look like the aggressors in this scenario).
The next few months should be interesting and will determine how long it would take to get to the situation state above (if ever).
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Sherif Mansour Jul 22, 2013

For me the SCAF of 2011 has learnt lessons from their 17 month reign after the ousting of Mubarak.
It was obvious that their rule was untenable given the popular support and pressure for a civilian state.
Their control of the country was after all promised as a transition and that’s what the public was expecting.
SCAF had no credible answers to make that temporary condition a permanent one.
The more oppressive they were the more the more their plans backfired.
In 2013 they sought the consent of the opposition in placing the interim government and their aim is to achieve early elections (which is what the public wanted).
This means in 2013 SCAF can achieve their goals by making the large parts of the public and the opposition accomplices in the act.
Today they have the luxury of deflecting any political decision to the interim civilian government.
They still have to answer for the arrests, but they know it’s a battle that they can afford to avoid for the time being.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.

https://prosyn.org/725ornJru

Разоружение военизированной власти Египта

Introductory Offer: Save 30% on PS Digital

New Comment

Contact us

Log in/Register

Разоружение военизированной власти Египта

Introductory Offer: Save 30% on PS Digital

Edit Newsletter Preferences

Set up Notification