货币前线,大家闭嘴

美国剑桥—“货币战争”一词是“竞争性贬值”吸引眼球的说法。最近,日本为了启动经济而实施了一系列措施,其中的货币措施让日元猛烈贬值,这也使货币战争问题成为即将到来的北爱尔兰G8峰会的主要问题。但理应如此吗?

据IMF的说法,竞争性贬值发生于多国“操纵汇率……以获得较之其他成员国的不公平的竞争性优势……”。但在“货币战争”一词用于美联储、日本银行和其他央行最近几年的扩张政策时,往往会漏掉一个关键点。货币刺激对一国贸易余额、进而对贸易伙伴国商品需求的影响是模棱两可的:汇率产生反应时的支出转换效应会被支出扩张的增加效应抵消。重塑的收入增长意味着更多地从他国进口。

 “货币战争”更适于描述各国有意地采取干预以贬值本币从而提振贸易余额。但国家当局会、也应该追求首先满足本国利益的经济政策。国际合作可能会带来丰硕成果;但若溢出效应的性质并非对所有各方都相对清晰,没有理由采取合作态度。比如,所有人都同意,污染和关税的溢出效应是消极而不是积极的外部性。但对货币政策来说就不那么一目了然了。

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To access our archive, please log in or register now and read two articles from our archive every month for free. For unlimited access to our archive, as well as to the unrivaled analysis of PS On Point, subscribe now.

required

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, which describes the personal data we collect and how we use it.

Log in

http://prosyn.org/faHOSUr/zh;

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated cookie policy and privacy policy.