Who Will Pay the Price of Enlargement?

LONDON: The glow of optimism at the European Union's Helsinki summit last month, when EU leaders decided to extend membership negotiations to all ten candidate countries from Central and Eastern Europe, plus Malta and Cyprus, is fading fast. It has now become crystal clear that enlargement is going to be a very difficult process: difficult to negotiate, and just as difficult, perhaps, to sell to the voters.

The predicament can be expressed in stark terms: Who Will Pay the Price of Enlargement? Enlargement will not be cost-free: there will be losers, as well as winners. But the common dilemma facing all sides in this negotiation, the ins as well as the outs, is to make sure that there are not too many losers in any one country. Otherwise, enlargement simply will not get past the voters.

The most immediate manifestation of this predicament is the European Union's Common Agricultural Policy. This policy has long been a burden, both on EU consumers, because it has kept food prices high, and on EU taxpayers, because the subsidy to farmers' incomes costs the Union some e(Euro) 41bn every year (about $40bn), or around half of the total EU budget. But it has been part of the core bargain which has kept the union together.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To access our archive, please log in or register now and read two articles from our archive every month for free. For unlimited access to our archive, as well as to the unrivaled analysis of PS On Point, subscribe now.


By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, which describes the personal data we collect and how we use it.

Log in


Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated cookie policy and privacy policy.