The IMF has Failed, Out with Camdessus

CAMBRIDGE: If emerging markets have become a speculative casino, then the IMF's managing director, Monsieur Camdessus, is the chief croupier. From Mexico to Asia, Russia to Brazil the IMF has stood by while currency crises boiled up over the past few years. Of course, the IMF was fast to mobilize vast amounts of money to throw into the pot once it boiled over, but its lack of decisive remedies has failed to move countries out of danger.

If all of this true, why should the IMF's managing director keep his job? Asking for more money and more powers, belatedly bailing the private sector into the process, talking of a new international financial architecture: all of it sounds like hot air, given the Camdessus record. So, first things first: there is an urgent need for dramatic reform at the IMF. The managing director, however, has not got a clue as to how to fix things. M. Camdessus has lost his legitimacy, and he must go.

Abba Eban once said of the PLO that it never missed an opportunity to miss an opportunity. The IMF under Camdessus seems to be just as willfully blind. It has shown a pattern of missing every single crisis or misjudging the sustainability of every financially precarious situation.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To read this article from our archive, please log in or register now. After entering your email, you'll have access to two free articles every month. For unlimited access to Project Syndicate, subscribe now.


By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, which describes the personal data we collect and how we use it.

Log in;

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated cookie policy and privacy policy.