El FMI y la coordinación mundial

NUEVA YORK – Antes de la crisis de 2008, el Fondo Monetario Internacional estaba en decadencia. La demanda de préstamos era escasa, por lo que tenía pocos ingresos. Asia seguía recelando del Fondo aun diez años después de las crisis monetarias de finales del decenio de 1990. Sus talentos analíticos seguían siendo grandes, pero los reajustes de plantilla los pusieron en peligro.

La crisis cambió todo eso. Quedó claro que correspondía al FMI un papel decisivo en la tarea de abordar la inestabilidad inducida por la crisis. Además, gracias a los amplios y muy arraigados conocimientos técnicos multinacionales, sus actividades son fundamentales para lograr soluciones cooperativas a escala mundial para los problemas económicos y financieros. Sin dichas soluciones, el sistema tendrá tendencia a volverse periódicamente inestable y a seguir sendas insostenibles que acaben destructivamente. Acabamos de vivir uno de esos episodios.

El FMI es necesario para la consecución de varios objetivos decisivos. Uno de ellos tiene que ver con la reacción ante las crisis. En una conmoción financiera mundial como la nuestra más reciente, las corrientes de capitales cambian de rumbo abrupta y espectacularmente, con lo que causan problemas en materia de crédito, financiación y balanza de pagos, además de unos tipos de cambio inestables. Si no se abordan, dichos problemas pueden causar daños generalizados en una gran diversidad de países, muchos de los cuales son espectadores inocentes.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in

  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now