The Forgotten Virtues of Free Trade

We have become so accustomed to thinking of free trade as a specialist matter for liberal economists and negotiators in dark suits that we forget how a century ago, free trade was a core belief for many democrats, radicals, women activists, and, indeed, organized labor. Today, too, any new deal to promote trade must be based on democratic reform from the bottom up.

LONDON – “Laissez-faire,” French President Nicolas Sarkozy recently declared, “is finished.”  Perhaps, but should we really be satisfied if he is right? If laissez-faire has run its course, what will possibly replace it as the foundation of an open, global society?

Now more than ever, it is worth remembering that the last great financial crash not only inspired the New Deal in the United States, but also plunged the world into a new dark age of economic nationalism and imperialism. Free trade is far from perfect, but the alternatives are worse. Protectionism is bad for wealth, bad for democracy, and bad for peace.

Yet a new wave of protectionism is a genuine danger. Barack Obama, appealing to swelling protectionist sentiment among Americans, threatened during his presidential campaign to rewrite the North American Free Trade Agreement unilaterally. This July, the World Trade Organization’s Doha trade round fell to pieces, partly because the US refused to lower its agricultural subsidies.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To continue reading, please log in or register now. After entering your email, you'll have access to two free articles every month. For unlimited access to Project Syndicate, subscribe now.


By proceeding, you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions.

Log in;

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated cookie policy and privacy policy.