O Estilo Paranóico em Economia

NOVA DELI – Porque se convertem tão depressa as discussões económicas de notoriedade elevada em ataques ad hominem? Talvez o exemplo recente mais difundido seja a campanha do laureado com o Nobel, Paul Krugman, contra os economistas Carmen Reinhart e Kenneth Rogoff, em que o primeiro passou rapidamente da crítica a um erro num dos artigos dos segundos, a acusações sobre o seu compromisso com a transparência académica.

Para quem conhece estes dois soberbos macroeconomistas internacionais, como eu conheço, é evidente que essas acusações deverão ser rapidamente ignoradas. Mas permanece a questão mais ampla de saber porque o estilo paranóico se tornou tão preponderante.

Uma parte da resposta advém de a economia ser uma ciência inexacta, com excepções para quase todos os padrões de comportamento que os economistas assumem como adquiridos. Por exemplo, os economistas predizem que preços mais altos de um bem reduzirão a sua procura. Mas os estudantes de economia sem dúvida que se lembrarão do seu encontro precoce com os “bens de Giffen”, que violam o padrão habitual. Quando as tortillas se tornam mais caras, um trabalhador Mexicano pobre poderá ter que aumentar o seu consumo, porque deverá diminuir o consumo de alimentos mais caros como a carne.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in

  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now