WASHINGTON D.C.: Economies fail when governments seize too much control. So you would expect a burst of growth in the post-communist world, as new markets emerged and governments retreated. Instead, many economies followed communism itself into collapse.
Why did this happen? Transition from one economic order to another is usually seen as a cause of decline. It is no such thing. Deng's reforms in China generated vast increases in wealth. When German and Japanese dictatorships were defeated in WWII, it was assumed that recovery would take decades. Both countries soon enjoyed economic miracles. For all its brutality, even the Soviet imposed transition to communism in the immediate postwar years did not incite a protracted fall in output.
So what made the post-communist transition different? Although there are signs of improvement, economic performance has been poor in many countries because thriving markets are not conjured out of thin air. Markets require institutions that most countries lack. Prosperous countries have them, but take them for granted.
To continue reading, register now.
Subscribe now for unlimited access to everything PS has to offer.
Since the 1990s, Western companies have invested a fortune in the Chinese economy, and tens of thousands of Chinese students have studied in US and European universities or worked in Western companies. None of this made China more democratic, and now it is heading toward an economic showdown with the US.
argue that the strategy of economic engagement has failed to mitigate the Chinese regime’s behavior.
While Chicago School orthodoxy says that humans can’t beat markets, behavioral economists insist that it’s humans who make markets, which means that humans can strive to improve their functioning. Which claim you believe has important implications for both economic theory and financial regulation.
uses Nobel laureate Robert J. Shiller’s work to buttress the case for a behavioral approach to economics.
WASHINGTON D.C.: Economies fail when governments seize too much control. So you would expect a burst of growth in the post-communist world, as new markets emerged and governments retreated. Instead, many economies followed communism itself into collapse.
Why did this happen? Transition from one economic order to another is usually seen as a cause of decline. It is no such thing. Deng's reforms in China generated vast increases in wealth. When German and Japanese dictatorships were defeated in WWII, it was assumed that recovery would take decades. Both countries soon enjoyed economic miracles. For all its brutality, even the Soviet imposed transition to communism in the immediate postwar years did not incite a protracted fall in output.
So what made the post-communist transition different? Although there are signs of improvement, economic performance has been poor in many countries because thriving markets are not conjured out of thin air. Markets require institutions that most countries lack. Prosperous countries have them, but take them for granted.
To continue reading, register now.
Subscribe now for unlimited access to everything PS has to offer.
Subscribe
As a registered user, you can enjoy more PS content every month – for free.
Register
Already have an account? Log in