Tempting Science

Scientists everywhere are increasingly uneasy at the rising influence of business upon university research. They realize that direct financial connections with the private sector can damage their reputation for independence and integrity. Nevertheless, the traditional doors separating academia from industry are being quietly dismantled - sometimes even smashed down. Specious free-market doctrines are devaluing the public services that those doors protected, not least the free flow of well-informed, critical speech that is vital to open inquiry.

Of course every scientist wants more money to do research; and every nation needs as much good science as it can get. But good science is expensive: so if some perfectly reputable company is prepared to pay for it, why be choosy?

Industrial research is an immense asset to society, not least in advancing scientific knowledge. But commercial firms are not philanthropies. They are under constant competitive pressures; shareholders expect a return on their investment. Even when not trying to buy exclusive access to profitable new discoveries, they are always in the market for preferential consideration. Valuable gifts may appear to purchase intangible favours. Cash for scientific answers is not as obviously corrupt as cash for parliamentary questions, but smells as nasty.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To read this article from our archive, please log in or register now. After entering your email, you'll have access to two free articles every month. For unlimited access to Project Syndicate, subscribe now.

required

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, which describes the personal data we collect and how we use it.

Log in

http://prosyn.org/iOxYWu0;

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated cookie policy and privacy policy.