Las acciones y el largo plazo

Berkeley – Después de la segunda baja del 40% en el índice compuesto de Standard & Poor´s de acciones comunes en una década, los inversionistas globales están en pánico. Los fondos invertidos, y reinvertidos, en el índice compuesto de S&P de 1998 a 2008 han rendido una rentabilidad real de cero.: los dividendos ganados sobre la cartera han sido apenas suficientes para compensar la inflación. Hay que remontarse hasta 1982 para ver una década al final de la cual los inversionistas habrían hecho mejor poniendo su dinero en bonos corporativos o del Tesoro de Estados Unidos en lugar de hacerlo en una cartera diversificada de acciones.

Así es que los inversionistas se están preguntando: ¿serán las décadas futuras como la que acaba de pasar? Si es así, ¿no habría que alejarse de las inversiones en valores?

La respuesta es, casi con toda seguridad, no. A una o dos décadas, el rendimiento pasado de las acciones y los bonos no es una garantía fiable ni una buena guía para los resultados futuros. Periodos como 1998-2008, en que las acciones tuvieron un rendimiento relativamente malo, están precedidos por periodos -como 1978 a1988 y 1988 a1998- en que les fue relativamente bien, y con toda probabilidad sobrevendrán periodos similares.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now