Shock Therapy for Russia’s Bureaucrats
CAMBRIDGE: All the postcommunist countries that implemented radical reforms, except for Russia, began to see rapid growth by 1994, at the latest. Russia’s GDP, on the other hand, fell in 1995 and 1996. So why hasn’t the Russian economy benefited from the kind of liberalization that worked so well elsewhere?
The answer is that the benefits of shock therapy depend critically on how well the government itself makes the transition from overseeing a communist regime to supporting a market economy. While other countries which pursued radical reform, such as Poland, are now advancing smartly in their political transition, reform of Russia’s political system has barely nudged forward. It is this tardiness in the transformation of government that shackles economic growth.
One element key to helping smooth the operations of a market economy is the creation of institutions and laws protecting private property. Another is depoliticization. Although shock therapy, with price liberalization, stabilization, and privatization, greatly diminished the extent to which the Kremlin controls Russia’s economy, remnants of the massive communist bureaucracy remain. Politicians continue to exercise overweening sway, especially on the local level, and they abuse their regulatory powers to enrich themselves and assist their political allies. This kind of behavior, along with a lack of private property protection, is devastating for growth.
We hope you're enjoying Project Syndicate.
To continue reading, subscribe now.
Get unlimited access to PS premium content, including in-depth commentaries, book reviews, exclusive interviews, On Point, the Big Picture, the PS Archive, and our annual year-ahead magazine.
Already have an account or want to create one? Log in