Tout sur l’usage disproportionné de la force

Alors que la guerre se poursuit au Liban, le terme usage disproportionné de la force est utilisé à tort et à travers, comme s’il reposait sur un principe de droit international parfaitement clair, permettant de déterminer quand l’usage de la force est disproportionné et pourquoi il est illégal. Mais l’existence de victimes civiles dans le cadre de combats militaires n’est pas un argument suffisant. Le fait que plus d’enfants meurent d’un côté que de l’autre ne suffit pas non plus à remplir les critères, quels qu’ils soient. Que signifie alors ce terme, et quelle est sa place dans le droit de la guerre ?

Commençons par le commencement. En droit national, la notion de légitime défense implique que l’usage de la force est à la fois nécessaire et proportionné aux intérêts protégés. Par exemple, un commerçant a-t-il le droit de tirer sur des pillards qui s’enfuient en emportant ses marchandises ? S’il n’y a pas d’autre moyen d’arrêter les voleurs, l’usage de la force est nécessaire.

Mais est-il proportionné ? Si le prix à payer pour les pillards est manifestement beaucoup plus important que la valeur des marchandises volées, le commerçant ne doit rien faire, du moins sur le moment. Il peut toujours avoir recours à la police, avec la possibilité que les marchandises soient récupérées. En d’autres termes, l’usage de la force est disproportionné à partir du moment où son prix est trop élevé.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/EBbeLYB/fr;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now