Russia: Meltdown or Stabilization?

CAMBRIDGE: Another crisis, another government. So sputters postcommunist Russia. By restoring Viktor Chernomyrdin as prime minister Boris Yeltsin apparently hopes to stanch the economic bloodletting of the past month. That can’t happen if Mr. Chernomyrdin returns to his stodgy, do-nothing ways.

Only a month ago, in another cliff hanger weekend, Russia received a major IMF and G-7 bailout package; important reforms were promised, a measure of confidence was restored. In no time, Russia was back in the tank; decisive reform did not happen, confidence did not last, overnight investors tried to bail out - the rats left the ship, if you like the unflattering image.

Whether Russia now enters meltdown remains to be seen; clearly it is a prospect. But so is the possibility that the current crisis galvanizes enough consensus to move ahead and do some of the hard work that every country in the end achieves. Its is only a question of time, and of how deeply living standards fall in the interim and how much politics deteriorates toward extremism, just as in the 1920s. In the end every unstable country stabilizes because instability becomes simply unbearable.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To read this article from our archive, please log in or register now. After entering your email, you'll have access to two free articles from our archive every month. For unlimited access to Project Syndicate, subscribe now.

required

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, which describes the personal data we collect and how we use it.

Log in

http://prosyn.org/19RBi5v;

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated cookie policy and privacy policy.