Le protectionnisme contre le développement

CAMBRIDGE – Voici l'un des plus grands mystères de l'économie mondiale : comment se fait-il que pendant 200 ans la croissance des pays riches a été plus rapide que celle des pays pauvres ? L'économiste américain Lant Pritchett qualifie ce phénomène de Grande divergence (Divergence, Big Time). En 1776, quand Adam Smith a écrit La richesse des nations, le revenu par habitant du pays le plus riche du monde à moment-là, probablement la Hollande, était quatre fois supérieur à celui des pays les plus pauvres. Deux siècles plus tard, la Hollande était 40 fois plus riche que la Chine, 24 fois plus riche que l'Inde et 10 fois plus que la Thaïlande.

Mais au cours des trois dernières décennies, la tendance s'est inversée. Aujourd'hui la Hollande est seulement 11 fois plus riche que l'Inde et à peine 4 fois plus riche que la Chine et la Thaïlande. Constatant ce renversement, Michael Spence, économiste titulaire du prix Nobel affirme que le monde est sur la voie de la prochaine convergence.

Pourtant il y a des contre-exemples. Entre 1980 et 2012, les rapports des richesses entre la Hollande d'une part et le Nicaragua, la Côte d'Ivoire et le Kenya d'autre part ont fait un bond respectivement de 5,8 à 10,5 ; de 7,7 à 21,1 et de 15 à 24,4.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in

  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now