Politics

تحويل الأزمة إلى نجاح في ألمانيا

May 13, 2016 Kemal Derviş

برلين- طبقا لإستطلاع للرأي نشر في أوائل مايو من قبل أ ر دي دويتشلاند تريند فإن الدعم الشعبيلحزب البديل من أجل ألمانيا (أقصى اليمين) يصل الآن لنسبة 15% من حوالي 5% قبل سنة فهل يمكننا أن نوقف هذا التوجه الخطير ؟

لقد كان صعود حزب البديل من أجل ألمانيا منذ الصيف الماضي نتيجة مباشرة لتزايد أعداد اللاجئين- حوالي مليون شخص سنة 2015- الذين دخلوا ألمانيا ولقد جعل الحزب معارضته لإدخال اللاجئين محور برنامجه والذي تضمن أيضا توجها عدائيا ضد الإتحاد الأوروبي وبرنامج إجتماعي محافظ للغاية أضيف إليه بعد ديني طائفي علني في مؤتمر الحزب بتاريخ 3 مايو في شتوتجارت .

لكن ما يزال الوسط السياسي العريض في ألمانيا يحتفظ بمكانته فما يزال الحزب المسيحي الديمقراطي الذي ينتمي ليمين الوسط وحلفاءه يتمتعون بدعم 33% من الناخبين والحزب الإشتراكي الديمقراطي من يسار الوسط ما يزال يتمتع بدعم 20% من الناخبين كما دعم 13% من الناخبين حزب الخضر وحتى حزب الديمقراطيين الأحرار تمكن من إستعادة مكانته بعد الأوقات الصعبة التي مر بها حيث يتمتع الآن بدعم حوالي 6% من الناخبين .

To continue reading, register now.

Subscribe now for unlimited access to everything PS has to offer.

As a registered user, you can enjoy more PS content every month – for free.

Already have an account? Log in

PS Events: What Economics is Missing

Neglect the insights of women, particularly in economics, and society suffers. At PS’s next virtual event, What Economics Is Missing, Minouche Shafik, Dani Rodrik, Vera Songwe, and others will debate how to create the conditions for achieving genuine inclusivity in economics.

new comment has been posted. new comments have been posted.

0 Comments on this paragraph, 7 Comments on this article

Thomas Lloyd May 25, 2017

I agree with Kemal Dervis on most of the points he made, however, long term benefit? Refuge by its nature is a temporary thing so when the war in Syria ends as all wars do eventually the refugees return home either willingly or unwillingly.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
j. von Hettlingen May 16, 2016

Kemal Derviş, a former Turkish minister hopes that Germany will benefit more from the refugees than his country, "turning crisis into success." Despite support for the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD), he still thinks that the "broad political center" will survive next year's general election, allowing the incumbent government to continue to rule with a grand coalition, with - most likely - Angela Merkel remaining in power.
The AfD had won big in regional elections last March - the strongest showing for a right-wing populist party since World War II, given the fact that it didn't exist four years ago. Nevertheless it would be to rash to conclude that the party's victory was a result of a rejection of Merkel's policy. On the contrary, the civil society in Germany has proven to be robust, and a substantial majority of voters across all parties, except the AfD, embraces tolerance.
However it would be irresponsible of Merkel to ignore the concern of many Germans about her open-door policy, which has seen well over 1.1 million migrants enter the country in the past year or more. The author sees two scenarios that - one way or the other - will have an impact on Germany and the rest of the world.
He starts with the "bleak" outlook of a failure to "integrate the refugees socially and economically," leading to "political discontent, " while the refugees "become increasingly frustrated with their plight." They would be under the watchful of nationalists and populists, and anything they do to vent their anger could incite to " violence from both sides." A terrorist attack would only vindicate the popular belief that migrants pose a security threat. This would potentially weaken "the very fabric of German society." Islamophobia would become "fodder for religious extremists in the Middle East," confirming "their narrative of inevitable religious and civilizational conflict."
If Germany could turn the "challenge into another success," by integrating the refugees "quickly," and the country would "resume its path of moderate politics, social solidarity, and economic growth." There is hope that in the long run the refugees "could actually make a strong contribution to German prosperity." But it requires investment in educating and providing for them, which "remains a burden in the short term." For the moment, Germany's economy can still absorb the costs, but a recession could easily change the tide.
Indeed, a "successful integration," is a two-way street, that requires mutual understanding and reciprocity from both sides. The author says, "the refugees will have to accept the rule of German law, even if in some cases it does not make sense to them," saying that they and their host will have to work out how to co-exist peacefully, based on laws and rights. But he seems to emphasise more on the duty of the host rather than the obligation of the guests.
The author also points out that the "large existing community of former immigrants could be helpful in articulating and implementing that delicate balance, imperfect as it may have been at times." Does he realise that the roughly 3 million Turkish immigrants living in Germany who, according to studies by the Berlin Institute for Population and Development, are less effectively integrated on average than other immigrant groups. They are more likely than others to be poorly educated, underpaid and unemployed? No doubt both sides had been fooling themselves for decades, since the 1970s. Neither Germany nor its "guest workers" had anticipated that they would have to put up with each other for more than 10 years. When the Turks remained, both sides didn't make much effort to work policies out for a successful integration.
The author can forget the "need for some burden-sharing by European countries, as well as efforts to achieve a marked slowdown in the refugee flow, while upholding the human rights of those fleeing conflict and death." Unfortunately there is no mood among European leaders to help resolve the refugee crisis, as the EU is grappling with its political future.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Paul Friesen May 14, 2016

Good article.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Steve Hurst May 14, 2016

http://uk.businessinsider.com/r-german-government-plans-to-spend-936-billion-euros-on-refugees-by-end-2020-spiegel-2016-5

Yup, 93.6billion, 2016 to 2020

Every assessment provides a bigger figure.
Fair guess the next one is bigger
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Peter Schneider May 13, 2016

A good example for nihilism and extremism is the German political class.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Steve Hurst May 13, 2016

There will be no happy ending
- M M May 13, 2016
  
  There will be no ending..
  A new reply to this comment has been posted.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.

https://prosyn.org/7unPpNmar

تحويل الأزمة إلى نجاح في ألمانيا

PS Events: What Economics is Missing

New Comment

Contact us

Log in/Register

تحويل الأزمة إلى نجاح في ألمانيا

PS Events: What Economics is Missing

Edit Newsletter Preferences

Set up Notification