Realism in Iraq

Iraq’s future, if it still has one, will depend, first, on Iraqi Shiites, Sunnis, and Kurds, and, second, on Iraq’s neighbors and their interests and risk calculations. But even if Iraq falls apart after an eventual US withdrawal, containing the consequences of its disintegration will require a regional consensus that only the US can bring about.

The Washington mountain has labored and brought forth less than a mouse. General David Petreaus and President George W. Bush have spoken, but United States policy in Iraq remains as it was. This policy has led the US into a trap, so that now the largest and most important power in the world is facing only bad options.

If the US followed its national interests, it would withdraw from Iraq as soon as possible, because the war can no longer be won. It is weakening the West’s leading power and strengthening the West’s enemies. But the US cannot withdraw without sending the entire region into chaos.

The US wanted to establish a democratic Iraq. Instead, after a US withdrawal, the country might fall apart, possibly leading to “balkanization” of the Middle East, with extremely dangerous consequences for the whole region.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To access our archive, please log in or register now and read two articles from our archive every month for free. For unlimited access to our archive, as well as to the unrivaled analysis of PS On Point, subscribe now.


By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, which describes the personal data we collect and how we use it.

Log in;

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated cookie policy and privacy policy.