Empty urban area

The Invention of Inequality

Everyone seems to be talking about – and condemning – today's high level of income and wealth inequality. But today’s ideology-driven debates oversimplify an issue that is exceedingly complex and affected by processes that we do not fully understand.

LONDON – Everyone seems to be talking about – and condemning – today’s rising level of economic inequality. Fueled by jarring statistics like Oxfam’s recent revelation that the world’s richest 62 people own as much wealth as the poorest 3.6 billion, popular support for left-wing figures like America’s Bernie Sanders and Britain’s Jeremy Corbyn is rising. But today’s ideology-driven debates oversimplify an issue that is exceedingly complex – and affected by processes that we do not fully understand.

Many of those engaged in the debate on inequality nowadays cite the French economist Thomas Piketty’s 2014 book Capital in the Twenty-First Century, which makes three key points. First, over the last 30 years, the ratio of wealth to income has steadily increased. Second, if the total return on wealth is higher than the growth in incomes, wealth is necessarily becoming increasingly concentrated. Third, this rising inequality must be reversed through confiscatory taxation before it destroys society.

The points might seem convincing at first glance. But the first statement is little more than a truism, and the second is falsified by Piketty’s own data, making the third irrelevant.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To continue reading, please log in or register now. After entering your email, you'll have access to two free articles every month. For unlimited access to Project Syndicate, subscribe now.

required

By proceeding, you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions.

Log in

http://prosyn.org/3QW9nV7;

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated cookie policy and privacy policy.