Paul Lachine

New Tremors in Global Finance and Trade

A long period of sluggish growth as a result of bloated government debt would be the equivalent of an extended bout with cancer after the heart attack that our economies have just survived. Prevention begins by curbing trade friction and developing sensible post-crisis monetary and fiscal exit strategies, sooner rather than later.

PALO ALTO – With the American and global economies in the early stages of post-recession recovery, serious questions remain about that recovery’s strength and sustainability. In addition to traditional business-cycle concerns, there is a long list of policy tensions threatening to curb growth, including: 1) protectionism; 2) currencies; 3) monetary- and fiscal-stimulus exit strategies; and 4) the explosion of public debt.

Recovery from deep recessions is usually strong – the American economy recovered from the two other deep post-World War II recessions with annual real growth over 6% for three years. But nobody forecasts strong growth like that now, because recoveries from financial crises are usually slow and painful.

It is worth remembering the real dimensions of the 1930’s Great Depression, with which politicians compare this recession to justify massive government intervention. From 1929 to 1933, real GDP in the United States fell 30%, and the unemployment rate reached almost 25%, while the depression itself lasted more than a decade – all large multiples of the recent decline, and of the somewhat larger decline that the intervention helped to avert.  

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/IykkYFq;