Comments 4

Obama dans le nouveau monde d’Israël

Mar 14, 2013 Diana Pinto

PARIS – Maintenant que Benyamin Netanyahu a formé un nouveau gouvernement israélien à partir d’un étourdissant kaléidoscope de possibles permutations post-électorales, la politique du pays s’est-elle déplacée vers le centre ? Le président américain Barack Obama, alors qu’il prépare sa première visite officielle, aurait tort de le penser.

La deuxième place inattendue du nouveau parti Yesh Atid (« Il y a un avenir ») de Yair Lapid aux récentes élections a certainement contribué à modifier le profil du gouvernement : les deux principaux partis orthodoxes, le Shass et le Judaïsme Unifié de la Torah, ne sont plus dans la course, tandis que deux partis centristes plus petits, Kadima et Hatnua, sont concernés. Mais ceux qui ont lâché un soupir de soulagement devant le recul du Likud de Netanyahu et des partis d’extrême droite du pays devraient pourtant s’inquiéter plus que jamais.

Le marchandage politique est terminé pour le moment, et le résultat semble scellé. Netanyahu restera Premier ministre et chaque parti – qu’il soit ou non au pouvoir – est prêt à bloquer, affaiblir, ou à faire modifier toutes les mesures du nouveau gouvernement. En Israël, la question qui se pose aujourd’hui n’est pas de savoir si le centre résistera, mais s’il compte encore.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

Featured

What’s Been Stopping the Left?

Apr 10, 2018 Dani Rodrik
Political Machismo

Apr 10, 2018 Ian Buruma
Will China Really Supplant US Economic Hegemony?

Apr 2, 2018 Kenneth Rogoff
Should Tech Companies Be More Tightly Regulated?

Mar 30, 2018 Simon Johnson
Liberal World Order, R.I.P.

Mar 21, 2018 Richard N. Haass

0 Comments on this paragraph, 4 in all 4 Comments on this article

Patrick Lietz Mar 21, 2013

Whichever view you take in the debate on Israel and whether it should have a Jewish identity or the "right" to exist, the fact of the matter is that Israel cannot survive without the continued support of the US. Similarly, European support is also important, as most of Israel's trade is with Europe.

As such, the extent of popular support for Israel in these regions carries weight. There is little doubt that this support is waning and opposition to further support is increasing.

Israel may behave in any way it wishes to, but should also understand that this comes with a price. No BRIC or Asian nation will come to Israel's rescue in times of need, and preferential treatments are not to be had.

This will be the attitude that Israel will have to come to expect from Europe and even the US in the not too distant future, if it does not change its policies towards the Palestinians or the emergence of a viable Palestinian state.
Marc Laventurier Mar 18, 2013

The banality of evil...
Edward Ponderer Mar 15, 2013

Something fundamentally is missed here.

The PA continues to publicly honor anyone who has killed Israeli citizens, even a busload of children. It continues to educate children in the hatred of all things Israeli, without any thought to even to future toleration of a Jewish minority within a Palestine in the elimination of an Israeli state. Hamas is even more direct on its intent for Israeli Jewish citizens. In short, in all internal actions, all present Palestinian leadership has geared its society, even the next generation, for never accepting any peace for any amount of land.

Atop this, lies a continuous history of land for non-Arabic promises of peace, followed by intifada and terrorism, followed by new demands, and so forth. For the average Israeli, the ever-improving missile batteries aimed at their cities from the last bit of land given for peace, serves as a most bitter reminder. At each stage, Israel is generally unilaerally condemned for anything and everything under the sun by an automatic majority. Already years back, one peace camp Israeli complained that others equated his "Peace Now" bumper sticker with "Idiot" -- and frankly he was finding it difficult not to agree with them.

Is it any wonder that the average Israeli now sees "land for peace" as the same kind of slogan as "Arbeit Macht Frei" ("Labor Makes Freedom"), placed over the entrance way of some WWII Nazi death camps. So what did they do in the ghettos and camps? -- Focus internally.

But is this healthy? Ultimate perhaps, this would be best for both the Israelis and the Palestinians, and the Arab World in general.

The Israelis must come to a sense of true unity -- a sense of national cohesiveness not primarily founded on a common existential threat. Such physical threat and build up of this mentality, has literally been without real let up since Israel's inception, and continued naturally when joined by others also fleeing the threat of physical or cultural annihilation -- whether survivors of the Second World war, the 600,000 Jewish refugees from the surrounding Arab countries, or those who fled Ethiopia or left Russia. And of course, the land for peace kicks in the teeth have only hardened things further.

As well, soul searching among the Palestinians themselves is required. What realistically do they want eventually? Can they find a unity, a cultural bonding among their own people which does not depend upon a common hatred of the "Zionist enemy"? Golda Meir once stated that once Israel's neighbors loved their own children more than they hated Israel, then there would be peace -- can the Palestinians, on a national level, make this breakthrough and challenge the Israelis with it?

And the surrounding milieu, from the Arabian peninsula to Tehran, simply cannot be ignored in this -- it is absurd to think the whole matter of peace is limited to the Israeli and Palestinian peoples.

Ultimately though Golda Meir's message represents a universal challenge. When love of our human commonality overcomes our hatred of difference -- that hatred will transform into respect and a sense of mutual responsibility. Only then will the ever darkening clouds over the whole world part to let in the sun's rays.

Whether historic, or merely the writer's creative, there was a particularly poignant scene from a docudrama on the life of Gandhi years back. During Gandhi's hunger strike, a certain trouble Hindu approached Gandhi about believing himself destined for hell over his murder of a Muslim child during a riot. Gandhi told the man that he knew a way out of hell. Find a Muslim orphan, and raise him as you would your own child -- but raise him to be a Muslim.

Can the Israeli, the Palestinians, Arab nations, and general Muslim World, and in fact the whole world -- particularly Europe today -- find it in themselves to reach the level of love above hate that Gandhi recommends? Of all wars, it is this internal one -- and it must truly be a "world war" (against a truly common enemy) -- that will be the fiercest, and whose victory will be the sweetest -- forever...
Zsolt Hermann Mar 14, 2013

The article and its assessment could be disputed in many ways, for example we could examine which proud modern western democracy would still pass as "free and democratic", starting with the US, following with the EU, and so on, or which leading nation is not on "their own orbit", making self centered decisions, always bending the rules towards themselves, only making connections, agreements when it suits them.
But the main point of the article is about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and why this point was not the main topic of the recent Israeli elections.
The reason is that looking from the viewpoint of the Israeli public the Israel-Palestinian conflict has no simple "two state solution".
The conflict is not about "two states". The problem is about Israel's right to exist in the Middle East among multiple Muslim, Arabic nations. (Not to mention the other sometimes much more severe conflicts within the Arab world which has no relation to Israel at all.)
No peace accord with the Palestinians would have any meaningful future unless a complete regional, moreover worldwide settlement is achieved, creating a full agreement between Israel and all the other Muslim, Arabic nations and their world wide supporters.
If such a full settlement is not achieved the Palestinians will be always used as cannon fodders, provoking agents against the Jewish state.
Demanding an isolated "two state solution" is similar to the short sighted, quick fix, superficial solutions for the global economical and financial crisis, without assessing and truly solving the real problems.
There are no quick, easy fixes in today's global, interconnected world, there are no isolated solutions, only global, mutually responsible ones.
In terms of the new government in Israel, and the new shift towards a more equal, more balanced Israel society, people outside of Israel should actually hope it works, and that it can achieve a true, long lasting national unity, as impossible and improbable it seems.
The matter is if in Israel, where the public is so multi-colored, multi-cultured, and some segments of the society truly hate reject each other, people can achieve national unity, mutual cooperation above all those differences and hatred, it could provide a blueprint for the crises ridden global world how to rise above inherent differences and hatred and start building something mutual together.