Le blasphème est-il un discours haineux ?

NEW YORK – L’assassinat de Salman Taseer, gouverneur de la province pakistanaise du Panjab ouvertement opposé à l’extrémisme religieux, a focalisé l’attention sur la loi draconienne du pays contre le blasphème. Adopté dans sa forme actuelle par la dictature militaire du Général Mohammad Zia ul-Haq il y a plus de trente ans, la loi anti-blasphème impose la peine de mort obligatoire pour quiconque est déclaré coupable d’avoir insulté l’Islam.

L’officier de police qui a assassiné Taseer aurait apparemment agi parce que ce gouverneur avait récemment lancé une campagne pour l’abrogation de cette loi – une démarche qui, aux yeux des extrémistes religieux pakistanais qui ont applaudi ce meurtre, constituait en soit un acte blasphématoire.

Pendant longtemps, les lois anti-blasphème étaient considérées comme un héritage malheureux des efforts entrepris en Angleterre au cours des luttes religieuses des 16ème et 17ème siècles pour supprimer les interprétations déviantes des écritures par les chrétiens. Ces lois se sont généralisées dans les pays de l’Asie du Sud et ailleurs au travers du régime colonial britannique. La version dure de cette loi du Général Zia au Pakistan fut adoptée dans le cadre de son action consistant à utiliser l’Islam pour légitimer sa politique de suppression de toute contestation.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in

  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now