Iran - a Land of Paradoxes

Iran is marking the 23 rd anniversary of its Islamic Revolution with nostalgic blasts at ``America, the Great Satan,'' thanks, in part, to President George Bush naming Iran as part of the ``Axis of Evil'' involved in terrorism and the production of weapons of mass destruction. Beneath the surface, however, Iran is no longer Ayatollah Khomeini's sharia state.

Iran does deserve to be classified as a regional and, perhaps, a global promoter of instability; its support for the fundamentalist Islamic terrorism of Hizbollah in Lebanon is, indeed, aimed at further undermining the diminishing chances for an Israeli-Palestinian reconciliation. But internal developments in Iran are complex, and demonization of the Islamic Republic is not helpful. Neither is a drawing a simple dichotomy between ``conservatives'' and ``reformers,'' the latter led by President Khattami, helpful.

In many respects, Iran is perhaps the most interesting country in the region, with the greatest potential for development leading to - not to a Western-style democracy - but greater opening and liberalization. The paradox is that Iran's potential is embedded in its ideology as an Islamic state. After the first turbulent and murderous years of the Iranian revolution, the last few years have shown some remarkable developments. Among them:

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To continue reading, please log in or register now. After entering your email, you'll have access to two free articles every month. For unlimited access to Project Syndicate, subscribe now.


By proceeding, you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions.

Log in;

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated cookie policy and privacy policy.