IMF at the Crossroads

WASHINGTON, DC: I have no personal opinion on the virtues of Caio Koch-Weiser, Germany's candidate to head the International Monetary Fund. But dithering over Michel Camdessus's replacement ought to stop. Stanley Fischer, a brilliant, experienced economist will lead the Fund very well in the interim. But the acting head of an organization has no mandate for change. So Fischer, while able, is not enabled.

That is a shame, for a constellation of factors now places the IMF at a crossroads where creative leadership is needed. Numerous suggestions for changes in its mission and modus operandi are in the air, not least the proposals of US Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers. (America's Treasury is known to throw its weight around!)

Leadership change also creates a natural moment for organizations to take stock and ask basic questions. Institutional inertia, always a powerful force at the Fund, is now at a cyclical low. Moreover, the IMF is not currently consumed with putting out international financial fires. It has the time to consider long-term issues. And what are those issues? Here is my list:

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To read this article from our archive, please log in or register now. After entering your email, you'll have access to two free articles every month. For unlimited access to Project Syndicate, subscribe now.


By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, which describes the personal data we collect and how we use it.

Log in;

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated cookie policy and privacy policy.