La Fed et la stabilité des prix

SAN FRANCISCO – Il y a une grande différence entre le mandat de maintien de la stabilité des prix de la Fed [Réserve fédérale américaine] fixé par ses statuts et l'objectif d'un taux d'inflation de 2% qu'elle s'est attribuée d'elle-même. Dans ces conditions, comment se fait-il que les dirigeants politiques confondent l'un et l'autre ?

La "stabilité des prix" est une expression dénuée d'ambiguïté : un panier de biens doit conserver le même prix sur une longue période, qu'il s'agisse de 10, 50 ou même 100 ans. Par contre un calcul simple montre que si l'inflation est de 2%, un article qui coûte aujourd'hui 100 euros en vaudra 122 au bout de 10 ans et atteindra la somme rondelette de 724 euros au bout de 100 ans.

Lors de sa récente audition devant le Congrès, Janet Yellen, la présidente de la Fed, a mentionné plusieurs fois le mandat de maintien de la stabilité des prix, mais elle a mentionné deux fois plus fréquemment un autre objectif de la Fed : un taux d'inflation de 2%. "L'inflation des USA est encore inférieure à l'objectif de 2% de la Commission" a-t-elle déclaré, il faut donc continuer à faire preuve de volontarisme "pour améliorer encore la situation de l'emploi et favoriser un retour de l'inflation vers un taux de 2% à moyen terme".

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in;
  1. Patrick Kovarik/Getty Images

    The Summit of Climate Hopes

    Presidents, prime ministers, and policymakers gather in Paris today for the One Planet Summit. But with no senior US representative attending, is the 2015 Paris climate agreement still viable?

  2. Trump greets his supporters The Washington Post/Getty Images

    Populist Plutocracy and the Future of America

    • In the first year of his presidency, Donald Trump has consistently sold out the blue-collar, socially conservative whites who brought him to power, while pursuing policies to enrich his fellow plutocrats. 

    • Sooner or later, Trump's core supporters will wake up to this fact, so it is worth asking how far he might go to keep them on his side.
  3. Agents are bidding on at the auction of Leonardo da Vinci's 'Salvator Mundi' Eduardo Munoz Alvarez/Getty Images

    The Man Who Didn’t Save the World

    A Saudi prince has been revealed to be the buyer of Leonardo da Vinci's "Salvator Mundi," for which he spent $450.3 million. Had he given the money to the poor, as the subject of the painting instructed another rich man, he could have restored eyesight to nine million people, or enabled 13 million families to grow 50% more food.

  4.  An inside view of the 'AknRobotics' Anadolu Agency/Getty Images

    Two Myths About Automation

    While many people believe that technological progress and job destruction are accelerating dramatically, there is no evidence of either trend. In reality, total factor productivity, the best summary measure of the pace of technical change, has been stagnating since 2005 in the US and across the advanced-country world.

  5. A student shows a combo pictures of three dictators, Austrian born Hitler, Castro and Stalin with Viktor Orban Attila Kisbenedek/Getty Images

    The Hungarian Government’s Failed Campaign of Lies

    The Hungarian government has released the results of its "national consultation" on what it calls the "Soros Plan" to flood the country with Muslim migrants and refugees. But no such plan exists, only a taxpayer-funded propaganda campaign to help a corrupt administration deflect attention from its failure to fulfill Hungarians’ aspirations.

  6. Project Syndicate

    DEBATE: Should the Eurozone Impose Fiscal Union?

    French President Emmanuel Macron wants European leaders to appoint a eurozone finance minister as a way to ensure the single currency's long-term viability. But would it work, and, more fundamentally, is it necessary?

  7. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now