WEF in Davos Fabrice Coffrini/Getty Images

自由民主的双赢幻想

华盛顿—很少有分析师预计到英国会投票退出欧盟,或者美国会选择特朗普做下任总统。但很快,人们就对这些误算的发生形成了一致解释。但是,面对如此复杂和重大的形势,我们必须小心翼翼,不能轻率推论。

目前的共识指责“精英”——学术、媒体和商业精英——过度沉浸在他们相对大同互通的世界中,而没有去聆听教育和互通程度较低的人民的声音。由于后者正是从全球化中获益最少的群体,他们也最有可能拒绝超国家制度(英国退欧的例子)和建制派候选人(特朗普的例子)。从诸多方面讲,忽视他们是一个显而易见的错误。

这一观点有很大的价值。“集体思维”时不时折磨着当今金融和知识精英,包括民意调查专家,他们常常具有相近的教育背景,在一起工作,阅读同样的媒体,出席从达沃斯到阿斯彭的同样的会议和场合。

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To access our archive, please log in or register now and read two articles from our archive every month for free. For unlimited access to our archive, as well as to the unrivaled analysis of PS On Point, subscribe now.

required

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, which describes the personal data we collect and how we use it.

Log in

http://prosyn.org/1ZfGgqo/zh;

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated cookie policy and privacy policy.