Exiting the Middle East Labyrinth

Much to Barack Obama's credit – and in contrast to George W. Bush – he tried, from his first day in office, to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. But he has virtually nothing to show for it, and the prospect of a two-state solution, which is in the vital interest of Israelis and Palestinians alike, is slipping away.

BERLIN – Two years have passed since Barack Obama was elected President of the United States. Much to his credit – and in contrast to his immediate predecessor – Obama tried, from his first day in office, to work towards a resolution of the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians.

Two years on, are good intentions the best that Obama’s new policy has to offer? After all, nothing of value has in fact resulted from them. Even worse, given that Obama’s effort to enforce a permanent moratorium on new settlement construction in the West Bank has failed, is that direct negotiations between the conflicting parties have run aground.

Good intentions count for little in life – and for less in politics. What matters, first and foremost, are results.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To access our archive, please log in or register now and read two articles from our archive every month for free. For unlimited access to our archive, as well as to the unrivaled analysis of PS On Point, subscribe now.

required

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, which describes the personal data we collect and how we use it.

Log in

http://prosyn.org/RHGls79;

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated cookie policy and privacy policy.