Death penalty noose India Prabhat Kumar Verma/ZumaPress

A Hanging in India

The execution of Yakub Memon for complicity in the serial bomb blasts that killed 257 people in Mumbai in 1993 was widely supported in India. But, however tempting it may be to declare that anyone who kills innocent people deserves to die, revenge is not a worthy motive for a state's actions.

NEW DELHI – On July 30, Yakub Memon, a chartered accountant and the brother of a notorious gangster now living in self-imposed exile, was hanged for complicity in the planning and execution of serial bomb blasts that killed 257 people in Mumbai in 1993. The hanging, India’s first in three years, has prompted reactions ranging from dismay to scarcely concealed bloodlust. And it has intensified the domestic debate over the death penalty.

To be sure, no one suggests that India’s judicial system did not function properly in Memon’s case. He was convicted according to due process of law, and his punishment was in accordance with valid statutes. During his 21 years behind bars, Memon exhausted every possible appeal available to him, including one for presidential clemency. The Supreme Court even held an emergency hearing at 2:30 in the morning, just hours before the execution was set to occur, before deciding to allow it to proceed.

But the question remains: Should capital punishment be on the books at all?

We hope you're enjoying Project Syndicate.

To continue reading, subscribe now.



Register for FREE to access two premium articles per month.