brics leaders Li Xueren/ZumaPress

Tomar en serio a los BRICS

PEKÍN – Este mes, mientras navegaba por el río Moscú en una fresca tarde, me encontré en medio de una intensa conversación con el director del Comité de Asuntos Externos de la Asamblea Popular Nacional de China (NPC). Mientras tanto, los parlamentarios sudafricanos y brasileños se balanceaban al ritmo de la música rusa, y un guía señalaba los puntos de interés. El primer foro parlamentario de los BRICS –Brasil, Rusia, India, China y Sudáfrica– llegó a un ameno final.

Antes del inicio del encuentro, muchos se preguntaban si era posible que los cinco parlamentos hallaran puntos de coincidencia. ¿Qué podría tener en común el quisquilloso y ruidoso Lok Sabha, con sus apasionados debates e interrupciones, con el decoroso NPC chino, una cámara de eco rigurosamente controlada de las decisiones del Partido Comunista? Para muchos, la participación en la nueva agrupación de los BRICS no brindaba una base lo suficientemente sólida para la cooperación.

Ese escepticismo se planteó en el propio grupo de los BRICS desde su creación y hubo quienes lo descartaron por ser la única organización internacional inventada por un banco de inversión. Específicamente, el término BRIC fue acuñado hace más de una década por Jim O’Neill, por entonces analista de Goldman Sachs, quien inicialmente no incluyó a Sudáfrica entre las principales economías emergentes.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/0LKv0dq/es;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now