Cleaning Up After Communism: Who Decides?
OXFORD: It is generally agreed that gross abuse of the environment was one of communism's many crimes. In some places -- Slovakia, for example, but also a Belarus reeling from Chernobyl's fallout -- resentment about the poisoned landscape, and the formation of environmental pressure groups, contributed greatly to the general disaffection with the old communist regimes.
Rising energy prices and growth in the once restricted service sectors of the economy -- both hitting hard at the Stalinist-era heavy industries upon which communists once lavished resources -- contributed to the region's improved environment of recent years. Many questions remain: What environmental standards should the transition economies apply? Should they impose the same environmental requirements on domestic and foreign investors? Questions also exist about the speed at which higher emissions and other standards applied to newly constructed plants are to be applied to older ones. But the issue I want to address is this: what role should foreigners play in these decisions?
Foreign influence takes several forms whose legitimacy varies. Neighbors have a legitimate interest in air and water pollution that spills over national boundaries. The framework for dealing with these on a bilateral or multilateral (regional) basis is not well developed but precedents exist for a variety of arrangements that take international spillovers into account in setting national policies.
We hope you're enjoying Project Syndicate.
To continue reading, subscribe now.
Get unlimited access to PS premium content, including in-depth commentaries, book reviews, exclusive interviews, On Point, the Big Picture, the PS Archive, and our annual year-ahead magazine.
Already have an account or want to create one? Log in