Paul Lachine

L'Amérique et la stratégie du vide

NEW-HAVEN – Apparemment, les responsables de la Réserve fédérale reconsidèrent le bien-fondé de leur interminable politique de relâchement monétaire (QE). Ils ont raison ! Non seulement son expérimentation ne débouche pas sur la reprise économique attendue, mais elle augmente le risque d'une nouvelle crise.

Les minutes de la réunion du 29 et 30 janvier de la Commission fédérale de l'Open Market (FOMC) évoquent un mécontentement croissant : "Beaucoup de participants… ont exprimé leur préoccupation quant aux coûts et aux risques potentiels liés à la prolongation des achats d'actifs". Il s'agit tant d'un risque de déstabilisation liée à l'arrêt des mesures de relâchement monétaire, que du risque de moins-value du portefeuille-titres qui gonfle à toute vitesse (actuellement 3000 milliards de dollars,  sans doute 4000 milliards de dollars à la fin de l'année). 

Aussi graves soient ces préoccupations, elles ne prennent pas en compte ce qui est probablement la plus grande erreur de la politique inédite de la Fed : la préférence accordée à une tactique à court terme par rapport à une stratégie à long terme. Aveuglée par la crise de 2007-2008, la Fed a aggravé son erreur de diagnostic initial en relançant à deux reprises sa politique de relâchement monétaire avant de la prolonger sans limite. La FOMC, croyant à tort au succès de la première phase de cette politique (QE1) - une injection massive de liquidités dans les profondeurs d'une crise horrible - a imaginé qu'il lui suffirait de continuer sur cette lancée.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/Ei9padj/fr;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now