A Theory of European Citizenship

There is something tragic about Europe's current development. Democracy's march across the continent, and the formation of a single market across much of Europe, have created unprecedented stability, security, and prosperity. The new single currency, the euro, and the European Union's promise to admit as many as ten new members in 2004, are powerful indicators of ongoing integration.

Yet, the ability of European institutions to accommodate deeper and broader integration is increasingly undermined by the persistence of a contradictory and long-obsolete ideal: the nation-state as the basis of political legitimacy and sovereignty. It is largely because the idea of common European citizenship is often understood by analogy to that of national citizenship that further European integration engenders so much fear and opposition.

The nation-state in the traditional sense presupposed a citizenry that was created as competing collective identities decayed. Venetians became Italians, Bavarians became Germans, and so on. Nation-builders throughout Europe promoted - with varying degrees of success, to be sure - the emergence of a dominant culture, an official language, and an identity based partly on distinctions vis-à-vis neighboring states, peoples and cultures. National minorities everywhere faced expulsion or enormous official pressure to assimilate.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To access our archive, please log in or register now and read two articles from our archive every month for free. For unlimited access to our archive, as well as to the unrivaled analysis of PS On Point, subscribe now.


By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, which describes the personal data we collect and how we use it.

Log in


Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated cookie policy and privacy policy.