Skip to main content

Economics

¿Fomenta la austeridad el desarrollo económico?

Jan 18, 2012 Robert J. Shiller

NEW HAVEN – En su clásica Fábula de las abejas o A vicios privados beneficios públicos (1724), Bernard Mandeville, el filósofo y satírico británico de origen holandés, describió –en verso– una sociedad próspera (de abejas) que de repente optó por hacer de la austeridad una virtud y abandonó todo el exceso de gasto y el consumo derrochador. Entonces, ¿qué ocurrió?

¡La propiedad despreciada,

abandonadas las glebas,

To continue reading, register now.

Subscribe now for unlimited access to everything PS has to offer.

As a registered user, you can enjoy more PS content every month – for free.

Already have an account? Log in

General-Onsite_Digital_1333x1000

Subscribe to PS Digital

Access every new PS commentary, our entire On Point suite of subscriber-exclusive content – including Longer Reads, Insider Interviews, Big Picture/Big Question, and Say More – and the full PS archive.

new comment has been posted. new comments have been posted.

0 Comments on this paragraph, 2 Comments on this article

Helena Hessel Jan 26, 2012

I do not agree that the issue is purely statistical. The
important issue is a 'qualitative' aspect of deficits. What are the reasons for government running/increasing/decreasing deficits? In the recent crisis, rising deficits in Iceland and/ or Ireland are 'qualitatively' very different from those in Greece or Portugal, for example. 'Putting' all deficits into the same basket and running a regression leads to confusing
results and interpretations.
If rising deficits results from the cut in taxes (benefitting mostly) rich (as in the U.S before the crisis), for example, the cut in spending to reduce them would lead to serious drop in growth. The issue , at hand, is really more political than a problem of uncontrolled experiment.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Robert Goldschmidt Jan 25, 2012

The author begs the question of how we measure a country's economic strength. GDP and corporate profits are not the best measure as they are distorted by deficits and trade. Perhaps the most accurate measure is aggregate wage-based demand. But even this measure needs to be adjusted (i.e. intrinsic wage-based demand) by removing the wages attributable to government deficits.

Looked at in this light, the effects of policy changes can be more easily anticipated and measured. For example, one can show that intrinsic demand has been falling for four decades in the US and that outsourcing to low-wage countries, automation and oil depletion are the structural sources of demand destruction.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.

https://prosyn.org/RcPFzzges

New Comment

Pin comment to this paragraph

After posting your comment, you’ll have a ten-minute window to make any edits. Please note that we moderate comments to ensure the conversation remains topically relevant. We appreciate well-informed comments and welcome your criticism and insight. Please be civil and avoid name-calling and ad hominem remarks.

Please select an option

Cancel

Send

Log in/Register

Email required

Password required Remember me?

or

Sign in with