Economics

Abenomika poevropsku

Aug 31, 2014 Nouriel Roubini

NEW YORK – Zvolení Šinzó Abeho japonským premiérem před dvěma lety vedlo k nástupu „abenomiky,“ třívrstvého plánu na záchranu ekonomiky před kolotočem stagnace a deflace. Tři složky – či „šípy“ – abenomiky tvoří mohutná měnová stimulace ve formě kvantitativního a kvalitativního uvolňování (QQE) včetně posílení úvěrů pro soukromý sektor, krátkodobá fiskální stimulace, po níž následuje konsolidace s cílem snížit schodky a zajistit udržitelnost veřejného dluhu, a strukturální reforma na podporu nabídkové strany a potenciálního růstu.

Na základě nedávného projevu prezidenta Evropské centrální banky Maria Draghiho v Jackson Hole se teď zdá, že ECB chystá pro eurozónu podobný plán. První součástí „draghinomiky“ je urychlení strukturálních reforem nezbytných k popohnání růstu potenciálního výstupu eurozóny. Pokrok u takto zásadních reforem je zatím neuspokojivý, v některých zemích (například ve Španělsku a Irsku) bylo vynaloženo větší úsilí, kdežto v jiných menší (namátkou zmiňme Itálii a Francii).

Draghi teď ale připouští, že pomalé, nevyrovnané a chudokrevné zotavení eurozóny není pouze odrazem strukturálních problémů, nýbrž také cyklických faktorů, které více závisejí na agregátní poptávce než na mezích agregátní nabídky. Nezbytná jsou tak rovněž opatření k posílení poptávky.

To continue reading, register now.

Subscribe now for unlimited access to everything PS has to offer.

As a registered user, you can enjoy more PS content every month – for free.

Already have an account? Log in

PS Events: What Economics is Missing

Our latest event, What Economics is Missing, is now live.

Click the link below for opening remarks from Dani Rodrik, followed by a discussion among Ashwini Deshpande, Raquel Fernández, Minouche Shafik, and Vera Songwe on how to achieve inclusivity in economics.

Watch Now

Nouriel Roubini

Writing for PS since 2007
174 Commentaries

Nouriel Roubini, Professor Emeritus of Economics at New York University’s Stern School of Business, is Chief Economist at Atlas Capital Team, CEO of Roubini Macro Associates, Co-Founder of TheBoomBust.com, and author of MegaThreats: Ten Dangerous Trends That Imperil Our Future, and How to Survive Them (Little, Brown and Company, 2022). He is a former senior economist for international affairs in the White House’s Council of Economic Advisers during the Clinton Administration and has worked for the International Monetary Fund, the US Federal Reserve, and the World Bank. His website is NourielRoubini.com, and he is the host of NourielToday.com.

new comment has been posted. new comments have been posted.

0 Comments on this paragraph, 6 Comments on this article

Lawrence Michael Sep 5, 2014

Let us look at some basics that some seem to touch upon but not articulate. For example the idea that an economy with a GDP of 50 trillion showing a 3% increase is doing worse than an economy with a GDP of 50 million showing an increase of 7% is obviously fallacious as anyone can see but usually read that fallacy in both reports as well as analytical pieces as this. The global economy is complex with any nth number of factors affecting the various players - with the finite nature of economy, human population and the planet earth being the three corner stones of recognitions one seems to easily escape in making such obvious fallacies so readable analytic pieces. The other aspect being - structural factors with attrition factors (they can be internal - citing Chandigarh as a city in Northern India as one sterling example of such attrition that show as degradation to the original idea as well as reality. They can be external - a bunch of simians landing up at NASA's Hubble Telescope site and operating it too). Both these factors affect the nature of supply & demand in both the senses: external as well as internal including the human/'cultural' factor that remains central to every human exercise and more so with economics. Globalization merely makes it more complex - with what may or can be controlled or even are! The word 'cultural' in quotes because we all do continuing debating over it including the anti-cultural that even then seek to claim the word culture without intending any pun. Keeping certain basic factors in mind does help in quantifying data more correctly than before, even when qualifying it as data always is both its basic types once again.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Gunnar Eriksson Sep 3, 2014

Remember that increased wages for ordinary people is a vital part of the prescription.
There is no lack of capital but it is only looking for rent. Tax idle and speculative capital for public investment
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Mukesh Adenwala Sep 2, 2014

To say the least, this is disappointing analysis. Established and forgotten wisdom claims that "you can pull a string but cannot push it." Lack of demand is on account of lack of employment, which in turn has been caused by technological advances - there is eminent argument that we are moving towards zero marginal costs. It has also been eminently argued that quantitative easing (or even QQE) pursued endlessly has no clear benefits. To hope that Animal Spirits would take care of the rest and till the time inflation becomes a problem we should continue to disregard it, fails to make sense. Perhaps it shows that in order not to admit another great depression, we continue to advocate and follow policies that have not worked these last six years.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Willard Hoffer Sep 1, 2014

The solution to the debt problem is not more debt! The west has lived beyond its means for far too long and now it is time to suck it up and suffer the consequences.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Zsolt Hermann Aug 31, 2014

It is interesting that the author recommends a policy, that by the latest measures and reports is failing in Japan.
It seems that any "gains" the "arrows" produced were simply cosmetic without any real life gains or improvements.

Which is understandable since we can try to resuscitate, kick, repaint a dead horse but even if we ourselves try to carry it beyond reason, it is still a dead horse.

There is no solution for the stubbornly pushed constant quantitative growth economic model and lifestyle in a vast natural system which is built on general balance and homeostasis.

We cannot try to build an artificial human bubble based on excessive, exploitative over-consumption when the system we evolved from and still exist in is based on natural necessities and available resources.

We cannot keep on competing with each other, succeeding at the expense of others and life, existence is based on mutually complementing cooperation, primarily working for the benefit, sustainable existence of the collective and only after for ourselves.

We are very unique creatures, we are truly above any other lifeforms with a conscious mind capable of critical assessment, even self-change, but still we are only part of the system.

We are not here to invent, create, establish a special human habitat above or against nature.
We are here to adapt to the system in a conscious, self-aware,m dynamic way.

Thus first we have to learn, understand the system, and then change ourselves, humanity according to it.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Paul A. Myers Aug 31, 2014

It seems to me that the Hollande government of France is proposing just this sort of program. The missing piece is concerted action by the ECB at the eurozone level.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.