Wednesday, July 23, 2014
Exit from comment view mode. Click to hide this space
2

Ukraine’s Own Goal

KYIV – Politics and sports are often an incendiary mix, as the controversy now swirling around the Euro 2012 football championship, to be co-hosted by Ukraine and Poland, demonstrates. German Chancellor Angela Merkel, European Commission President José Manuel Barroso, and other European Union leaders have said that they will boycott matches held in Ukraine, owing to the imprisonment of former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko and other opposition figures.

Why, two decades after communism ended and Ukraine gained its independence, does the country remain mired in economic torpor and an authoritarian politics that has aroused such ire in Europe? When a country like Ukraine develops slowly and remains poor, it is not because of natural disaster or resource constraints. Bad policies pursued by bad governments are to blame.

Contrary to what many Western economists think, the worst economic breakdowns are not the result of free markets gone haywire, but of excessive concentration of political power. To insure against the worst human and economic catastrophes, limits to political power must be introduced and a system of checks and balances maintained.

Witness the divergence in long-run economic growth between the Euro 2012 co-hosts. Poland’s GDP has almost doubled over the last 20 years, while Ukraine is still barely maintaining the output level recorded during the last year of socialism. Generally speaking, Central and Eastern European countries have performed better economically than the ex-Soviet countries (with the exception of the Baltic states).

Economic growth is a matter not just of quality of life, but of quantity as well. Child mortality rates have declined in all Central European countries over the past 20 years, especially in Poland, where the rate fell from 17 per 10,000 live births to seven. In the Czech Republic and Slovenia, life expectancy has increased from 71 to 77, similar to other Central European countries.

In Ukraine, by contrast, under-five child mortality rates have fallen only slightly, from 25 per 10,000 live births to 24, while life expectancy has declined from 70 years to 68. The same stagnation applies to Russia.

The post-communist record shows that the countries that reformed most successfully are also the most democratic – indeed, as democratic as any in the West. The worst economic outcomes in the region are found in countries that have diverged from democracy.

Democracy is not a panacea, but non-democratic regimes usually pursue worse economic polices than democratic governments do. The former engage in predatory and unpredictable regulation, which produces a bad business environment.

Another danger is heavy taxation. Official taxes are high when spending is high. When spending is high, it is usually social spending that is badly targeted, which means that only a small share of poor people really benefit. Moreover, corruption payments should be added to official taxation. It may turn out that most businesses are hit by heavy taxation of both varieties – so heavy that the economy cannot grow, as appears to be the case in Ukraine.

Furthermore, uneven protection of property rights – crony capitalism – means that a small number of businessmen are politically favored. They may pay lower taxes, or their competitors may be subject to raids by the authorities. Because the state uses its apparatus to deter competition – both informally, through arbitrary enforcement of property rights, and formally, through trade restrictions – crony capitalism is not only unjust, but also inefficient. Individual businessmen may succeed, but the economy will not. Without competition, capitalism works only a little better than socialism did.

A key ingredient of Poland’s success in the last 20 years was a clear separation, from the very beginning of the post-communist transition, between politics and business. There were uniform rules and equal protection for everyone. Poland introduced massive competition by dismantling monopolies and opening its economy to the world.

Moreover, Poland avoided extreme booms and the deep recessions that follow. Most booms are produced by bad monetary and fiscal policies. This is true of the recent boom-bust sequence in Spain, Ireland, the United States, the United Kingdom, Bulgaria, and the Baltics, among others. In Ukraine, too, a huge boom in 2004-2007 was followed by a contraction amounting to almost 15% GDP in 2009 – a direct result of domestic policies.

Ukraine’s record over the past 20 years demonstrates that it is not enough to abolish socialism. The real challenge is to build free-market, rule-based capitalism. And, to do that, an energetic civil society must demand an end to crony capitalism. Ukraine’s citizens can become more like their Central European neighbors, or they can allow the economy’s many distortions from past bad policies to persist, in which case they will fall further behind.

Exit from comment view mode. Click to hide this space
Hide Comments Hide Comments Read Comments (2)

Please login or register to post a comment

  1. CommentedJan Chudzynski

    Exactly 23 years ago, on 4th of June 1989, first post-commust general elections were held in Poland. Without any loss of unbiasedness of my comment, I claim that Mr Balcerowicz's supposed 'clear separation, from the very beginning of the post-communist transition, between politics and business' as a key ingredient of the growth of Polish GDP ( one of three dimension of the success mentioned in the article ) is a rather exotic opinion. To let my critique go beyond 'some people say' (or think) argument, I hereby provide you with one of the most emblematic examples of the existence of a considerable area where business and big politics indeed overlap. This, in my opinion, is still the case even 23 years after the transition process commenced. As his copatriot, I am worried by Balcerowicz being so eager to execute PR actions. He is not a right person to do it and project syndicate neither is the adequate agora.

    Poland gripped by 'bribery' row
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/2907087.stm

  2. CommentedFrank O'Callaghan

    A key question is: can any of the pure systems be democratic? Pure socialism becomes authoritarian and pure capitalism becomes Fascist. The mixed model of many of the Nordic countries has generated the best outcome in aggregate.
    There is a danger in reacting too strongly to the past system and not recognizing the danger of the diametrically opposite one.
    Democracy is not a panacea but it is the best we have. We need more democracy not only for the quality of life it generates but for the economic benefit in the long term.

Featured