Wednesday, November 26, 2014

Melting on Top of the World

POTSDAM – In 1845, Captain Sir John Franklin of the British Royal Navy led 128 men on two iron-plated steam ships, Erebus and Terror, into the Arctic, where they eventually disappeared. The voyage was the culmination of four centuries of failed attempts to navigate the Northwest Passage – a direct route from Europe to Asia across the Arctic Ocean – and remains one of the greatest tragedies in the history of polar exploration.

Today, a far greater Arctic tragedy is unfolding: the Arctic sea-ice cap is melting. Last month, an unprecedented new low was reached after decades of decline. Indeed, the ice cap’s area has decreased by half since the 1980’s, when summer sea-ice still extended over roughly seven million square kilometers, as opposed to less than four million today. It is now likely smaller than it has been for at least a millennium and a half.

In 2007, the Northwest Passage was ice-free for the first time in living memory. Boats of all sizes – including cruise ships – have sailed through easily in summers since then.

Walt Meier of the United States’ National Snow and Ice Data Center describes today’s ice cap as “crushed ice.” And it is getting thinner. In the last three decades, its volume has shrunk by roughly three-quarters. As the University of Laval’s Louis Fortier puts it, “we are three-quarters of the way to ice-free summers in the Arctic Ocean.”

In addition to the sea-ice loss, satellite data show that Greenland’s three-kilometer-thick continental ice sheet is also melting at a record rate. In July, 97% of the sheet’s surface was affected. The meltwater runoff in western Greenland was so strong that it swept away an important road bridge across the Watson River.

This ice loss, caused largely by human-induced global warming, has far-reaching environmental, geopolitical, and economic consequences.

For starters, Greenland’s meltwater is flowing into the ocean, raising global sea levels. As temperatures have increased, the sea level’s rise has accelerated from one centimeter per decade in the early twentieth century to more than three centimeters in each of the last two decades – an overall increase of nearly 20 centimeters since 1900. While the numbers may seem small, the rise significantly increases the likelihood of severe flooding along vulnerable coasts worldwide.

Greenland’s meltwater accounts for one-fifth of the global sea-level rise over the last decade. If its ice sheet melted completely, sea levels would rise by seven meters – meaning that we cannot afford to lose even a small fraction of the ice sheet. Meanwhile, satellite data show that Antarctica’s ice sheet, which is ten times larger than Greenland’s, is losing ice as well.

The vanishing Arctic sea ice also affects the atmosphere. Less ice reflects less sunlight, and more open ocean absorbs more heat, which is then released into the atmosphere, affecting wind and pressure patterns throughout the northern hemisphere.

In a recent study, Jennifer Francis and Stephen Vavrus showed that the northern hemisphere polar jet stream, an air current that flows over the middle to northern latitudes of North America, Europe, and Asia, has begun to show larger and more persistent meanders. This increases the likelihood of extreme weather events, like Russia’s heat wave and Pakistan’s floods in 2010, which affected millions of people.

Further exacerbating the problem, the disappearance of Arctic sea-ice has triggered a rush to secure newly accessible resources, particularly fossil fuels, which are a primary cause of global warming. (It has even revived efforts to find the wreckage of Franklin’s lost ships.)

The recent Global Energy Assessment, released by the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, shows that combating global warming while providing affordable energy worldwide is technologically and economically feasible. But the energy transformation must begin now. The longer powerful interests deny humanity’s contribution to global warming, the more difficult it will be to arrest and reverse its effects. One hopes that the satellite footage of the Arctic meltdown will help to inspire serious action.

  • Contact us to secure rights


  • Hide Comments Hide Comments Read Comments (2)

    Please login or register to post a comment

    1. Commentedjimmy rousseau

      It is quite possible that there will be an ice free summer before 2020. The consequences of this are unfathomable, sun absorbed by dark water will exacerbate the warming. Methane released from the arctic ocean is almost a time bomb waiting to go off. This problem would get worse even if we stopped co2 cold turkey. The prognostic for not stopping is very bad indeed. The crushed ice is not going to withstand the warming that is already in the pipeline and when we no longer have the air conditioner that is the arctic ice cap our weather will be bad indeed.

    2. CommentedZsolt Hermann

      The tragedy of the situation is that every time these issues are raised immediate arguments break out about the "human involvement" in the environmental changes and usually the we run into a dead end.
      Thus instead of entering such debates I would like to point out something we could all agree on.
      As we can witness through most natural catastrophes, climate changes, unknown changes happening totally out of the blue around us, we have no idea about the awesome forces surrounding us, not only we have no capability to handle them we cannot even predict when and where they might break out.
      Despite our obvious technological development we haven't gotten any closer to harnessing the natural environment because so far we approached this natural system with a very myopic view: how to exploit it for our own benefits, regardless of the natural laws of harmony and homoeostasis we unknowingly, or ignorantly disturb.
      We are not interested in how the system works, we do not want to become partners with it, we only care about what we can take our for our own pleasures.
      This behaviour comes from the misunderstanding that humans are above the natural system, when in fact we are simply part of it, another living species among the others, although contrary to other species we have a consciousness, awareness, a capability to evaluate ourselves and see the consequences of our actions and then adjust. But so far we haven't used these capabilities properly.
      Regardless of whether climate change is man made or not, today humanity is in a total collision course with the natural environment, as they said in the "Matrix", humans are like a virus, a cancer in the body of nature, exploiting, devouring it then moving on, but very soon we will have nowhere to move on. We are destroying the system and ourselves with it.
      And it all stems from our excessive, way beyond necessities and resources, constant quantitative growth socio-economic model, overproducing and over consuming stuff we simply do not need and have no natural desire for, we are simply brainwashed by very sophisticated machinery to keep buying and sinking into debt.
      In order to survive and build a sustainable future we have to explore, learn and adapt on ourselves nature's laws of general harmony and homoeostasis.
      We have no actual free choice in it, the system around us is vast and it is not going to change. Only we can change.